Question For Evolutionist?

Question

I posted this in the biology section but no one replied and most evolunist spend there time in the religon spirituallity section which is odd but anyways

Lets just pretend for a minute that some cells did actually try to get together billions of years ago. If there was oxygen in the atmosphere, it would have simply oxidized and that would of been the end of it. To overcome this problem the evolutionist says that there was no oxygen on the earth billion of years ago. But even then the ammonia would have been killed by UV light from the sun and then the evolving thing would die. The o-zone layer blocks UV light but then you have oxygen on the earth. So something can't evolve to life with oxygen and something can't evolve to life without oxygen. Oxygen remains have been found in some of the deepest rocks. Honestly, this fact alone disproves the whole theory of evolution.

As a tadpole turns into a toad, it no longer needs its tail. When the special gene gives the order, the tail cells begin to die. In other words, some living cells contain a gene that signal the death of the cell at an appointed time. Why would evolution develop genes that order their own death? By Definition, such a gene would not aid survival.

Name one orgasim that does not need oxygen .

Answer 1

Here's a good little site for you. It even has a video so you can understand it better:

http://www.teachersdomain.org/resources/tdc02/sci/life/cell/stetteroxygen/index.html

Answer 2

Ammonia isn't alive so it can't be "killed." The UV rays were also largely reflected by the high amounts of water vapor and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

There was some oxygen in the early Earth's atmosphere, it was just minimal.

The tadpole's losing its tail is a pretty obvious genetic advantage. Without it, it is more capable of maneuvering on land. The fact that some cells "die" doesn't make this an evolutionary disadvantage because the genetic material of the dead cells is preserved in the rest of the organism, which survives.

Cyanobacteria don't need oxygen to live.

Answer 3

Quote: "To overcome this problem the evolutionist says that there was no oxygen on the earth billion of years ago"

No. This fact is not some "evolutionist" conspiracy. It is well known from the science of Geology that the Earths early atmosphere had little oxygen - eg. the redox state of the huge iron deposits that we get most of our iron from, and etc. If you think that economic geologists and abiogenesis researchers are in a conspiracy against you then you have serious problems.

Others have debunked your claims. Now for a demonstration of your honesty and integrity. I'll check back.

Oh and most organisms don't use oxygen. Is that really the extent of your education? Yet you think you know better than hundreds of thousands of scientists who you think are somehow stupid?

Answer 4

There are plenty of organisms that don't require oxygen, including marine organisms of deep sea vents, and microorganisms like botulism. But that aside, your question makes no sense. You say "some cells tried to get together", but then they died because of the oxygen present. Huh?? If the cells were alive and healthy individually, why would they suddenly find oxygen toxic just because they started to form clumps?? Incidentally, your tail was also resorbed before birth, just like that of a tadpole - one of many indications of your distant ancestry.

In any case, scientists are always open to viable new scientific theories, so if you have an alternative scientific theory that explains the observable fact that new species have replaced earlier species ever since life appeared on earth, by all means, present it! If not, then evolutionary theory remains the only reasonable theory that explains these observable facts.

Answer 5

I think before you jump on to this line of thinking....

....you should learn some chemistry.

"....Oxygen remains have been found in some of the deepest rocks...."

they're called silicates and they make up most of the earths crust - of course they found oxygen, without it there would be no silicATES

Answer 6

there is a lot of organisms that dont need oxygen these organisms can change and do change over time, these organism are found deep in the earth as well as in the oceans, these organisms can make you sick because they are the same ones found in some canned foods

Answer 7

they would have used anaerobic metabolism (not using oxygen), the yeast used in fermentation use this process, oxygen would have been some of the by-product.

Your own muscles use anaerobic respiration when they can't get enough oxygen, the by product is what gives you cramp.

Answer 8

The bottom line is that believing in evolution requires just as much faith as does believing in creation.

Now everybody can sing together: "Oh, come, all ye faithful!"

Of course, the evoutionists don't go to a manger.. they go back to their laboratories...

god bless

Answer 9

anaerobic bacteria....some varieties release oxygen as waste while metabolizing methane, ammonia and other hydrocarbon compounds

Answer 10

Here:

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB030_1.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB035.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB035_1.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB035_2.html

Evolution not disproven. Sorry.