Common nonsense.
2007-12-19 18:47:38 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I agree..... But that would presume that the stated audience is the actual audience
2007-12-19 20:12:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anne Hatzakis 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'm always being forced to educate liberals, why should this be any different?
First, you need to define for us what "spiritually dishonest" means. I suspect that you don't, but I could be wrong.
Second, you need to explain to us how you know the motives of other users. Are you clairvoyant? I only say this because you seem to be assuming that another user is blocking the people they're addressing. If this is true, explain to us how you know?
To answer your question, no. I can think of several possible motives, some of which are a little weird, others calculating, others dishonest. I would need more information to be fair.
2007-12-20 03:03:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
Yep, it is. Can't take the answers to his own questions (not unlike another poster's "I was right!" for six hours rant a month ago). Funny how the Extreme True Believers Of All Faiths are so two-faced. So, I return the favor and block them from answering my own questions, which have nothing to do with their insanity, anyway.
2007-12-20 03:30:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
To answer you question.
First it is to stop nonsensical, babbling & fruitless answers
Second it is for sincere people who speaks their mind but not people who are fond of degrading others when they can't answer the question outrightly- the smart Alec and Ego-centric high and mighty "god of their own universe in their puny head" from further making a fool of themselves while calling other one like they are.
Thirdly, (there are more but I will stop it here) It is to prevent them from reporting "violations" to all my previous postings
As a matter a fact, I do appreciates all those sincere and truth seekers whichever camp they are from doesn't interested me.
2007-12-20 03:28:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
I would not call it spiritually dishonest, or any other sort of dishonest, but it is certainly bad manners.
2007-12-20 02:59:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
It is definitely intellectually dishonest.
2007-12-20 03:14:55 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Oh, is this a reference to that CommonSense dolt?
Thats a Creationist tactic. Flame everbody, then refuse to have a proper debate.
2007-12-20 02:52:04 · answer #7 · answered by mam2121 4 · 8⤊ 2⤋
Amen!
It's also cowardly, especially when you turn around and brag about it and then claim to preach the "gospel"
2007-12-20 03:00:55 · answer #8 · answered by Aravah 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
i find that utterly amazing
there was one who shall be nameless come here often with non questions promoting her religion and then she blocks all who point out flaws
i heard yesterday she said she was fed up with ignorance here and said all on here come from loveless families
2007-12-20 02:52:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
I do not think its possible but you may try Good luck.
2007-12-20 02:51:31 · answer #10 · answered by Mim 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋