I have seen in my own community a person who was innocent of a crime, yet took a polygraph and failed it. He was later released as his alibi was rock solid. Yet - had he not had an alibi - then what....the police would automatically consider him a strong suspect based on those results. Otherwise, why would they ask. Isn't this an injustice to assume just because a person refuses to take a polygraph, that he be considered a suspect based on that refusal. Couldn't it be the person is smart enough to know you don't gamble with your life based on unreliability ?
2007-12-19
15:55:34
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law Enforcement & Police