English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you support denying legislation to allow a persons right to die regardless of a persons faith or lack of one?

Do you support faith based laws such as a ban on abortion on people regardless of a persons faith or lack of one?

Do you support bringing Christianity back to pubic schools regardless of the non-Christian community such as Hindu, Jewish, and Muslim ( to name a few) that attend public school?

Do you support censoring public media outlets to conform to a sole pro-Christian view regardless of the diverse ethnic/religious society?

If you said yes to any of these questions

If the changes took place it would impact you as an individual or would it impact anyone who didn’t follow your beliefs more?


If the changes took place how do you think the non-Christian community would receive it?

Lastly, if the changes took place do you think the non-Christian community would feel free?

2007-12-19 13:25:19 · 13 answers · asked by phule_poet 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Tally thats the point I'm making

2007-12-19 13:34:28 · update #1

13 answers

1)No... I think if you are suffering than you should have the right to choose. Medical history should be evaluated first though.

2) No... I think it should be based on the circumstances, not the action itsself. (Child rape, incest, etc...)

3) Yes. I think there should be a class that introduces ALL religions though and not just one. That way our children can be educationally informed on everyone's beliefs and not just ignorant stereotypes.

4) I think that is the parents' job.

5) It would impact everyone and even me. With the abortion thing, I think it would effect everyone differently. Just because you're not christian doesn't mean you support abortion. With the religion classes, I think it should be elective and not forced to respect the atheists. If these changes did take place, I think the christian community would just look for other things to cry about.

2007-12-19 13:32:52 · answer #1 · answered by Y!A P0int5 Wh0r3 5 · 1 2

Do you support denying legislation to allow a persons right to die regardless of a persons faith or lack of one?
Could you write any less clear? Do I deny a person the right to die? No.

Do you support faith based laws such as a ban on abortion on people regardless of a persons faith or lack of one?
I don't not agree that that a ban on abortion is a faith based.

Do you support bringing Christianity back to pubic schools regardless of the non-Christian community such as Hindu, Jewish, and Muslim ( to name a few) that attend public school?
I don't care if they do or don't. I think that they should be able to teach any religion in schools if the popularity of the subject is granted.

Do you support censoring public media outlets to conform to a sole pro-Christian view regardless of the diverse ethnic/religious society?
No.

Lastly, if the changes took place do you think the non-Christian community would feel free?
Only the commie lib Atheists would get angry. They seem to want to regulate God out of existence.

2007-12-19 13:44:22 · answer #2 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 0 0

1. 'Do you support denying legislation to allow a person's right to die regardless of a persons faith or lack of one?

No. I think people should have the right to euthanasia if they are terminally ill and in great pain.

2. Do you support faith-based laws, such as a ban on abortion on people regardless of a persons faith or lack of one?

No. I believe people should have the right to choose abortion as one of several options.

3. Do you support bringing Christianity back to pubic schools regardless of the non-Christian community such as Hindu, Jewish, and Muslim (to name a few) that attend public school?

No, unless students themselves formed such an organization or unless there was a comparative religions class taught by a qualified instructor.

4. Do you support censoring public media outlets to conform to a sole pro-Christian view regardless of the diverse ethnic/religious society?

No. If this were attempted in the United States, it would be unconstitutional and illegal.

If these changes took place, I believe there would be an uproar among the non-Christian population, and rightly so.

2007-12-19 13:39:57 · answer #3 · answered by Chantal G 6 · 0 1

1. I think it depends on the person and their condition. If the person is dying and in a lot of pain and still in their right mind, I do believe that person should have the right to die.
2. I think abortion should be illegal regardless of faith or lack of faith.
3. I believe christianity should be brought back in the schools regardless of non-christian communities.
4. I do support censoring public media outlets to conform to a sole pro- christian view.

I think that some non christians would be very upset and they would probably not feel free. There are a lot of non christians that feel the same way as I feel.

2007-12-19 13:54:32 · answer #4 · answered by tabbycat 3 · 0 0

Life has value, even at its worst. And, who's to say a cure isn't around the corner that could otherwise save a life? If we legislate into law a person's right to die, aren't we opening the door to unforeseen permutations and gray areas that could open a Pandora's Box effect?

Countless millions have been aborted; never having a choice. Some of these embryos, if given a chance, could have grown up to solve many of the world’s current and future problems. What choice did they have?

Our forefathers never intended complete separation of church and state. Their intent was to protect the church from government intervention. Judeo-Christian values are there for everyone to benefit from regardless of peoples' religious affiliations. There are other religions that also have value. Values should be taught leaving faith choices to the individuals. If these values were taught, we would have a better world.

Any censoring would be in violation of our first amendment. Everyone should be able to voice an opinion. Laws provide a standard for us to live by and should protect those who can NOT protect themselves.

If anyone would have given you a blanket yes to all of your questions, as you posed them, without a deeper understanding of the implications and ramifications of such a black and white answer, I would say that they would have tunnel vision at best.

We are a country of many diverse cultures and beliefs. Unfortunately, there are some people who would choose darkness over Light. We should all lead by example in His Light, and in the hope that we will all eventually find ourselves on the road to enlightenment. It is there that we will find truth, and all our questions answered.

2007-12-19 14:47:56 · answer #5 · answered by Reader 1 · 1 0

Challenging questions. It would be nice if we could make this a more civilized world. Re Government schools, I favor eliminating them. I don't think the government should have the tools to cram its religion (secular humanism/evolution) down every-ones throat. I support the right to suicide, though I am against it personally. ( I do think some counseling should be a pre-requisite, and dietary supplements, but I don't feel that we can trust the government for that, either) I don't see pornography as a victimless crime, either re the subjects, or considering the results of the perversion of getting fixated on it. I do think that encouraging people to be better citizens would be to the advantage of people of all faiths. I certainly don't trust the government to do anything righteous of intelligent. (let alone both)

2007-12-19 13:35:23 · answer #6 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 0 0

Although I would love to see more people apply these principles and have those principles accepted. The reality is that this can never be acceptable.

Morals and rules on these behaviors can only work when it's due to a person's convictions and desire to follow those rules. If they don't agree with those rules, then the person will follow only the letter of the rules and look for a technicality to skirt around the intentions.

So, no, I don't want to see any of these laws imposed on anyone.

2007-12-19 13:31:35 · answer #7 · answered by Searcher 7 · 2 0

I've met a few secular people who were very much against abortion and euthanasia, so it's not just a religious thing.

I just can't get past the notion that even though America was founded on life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, that many people think, "Well heck, two out of three ain't bad!"

2007-12-19 14:03:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

These questions are stupid.

At school, we don't have any foods that contain nuts because some people are allergic. Then, why would we practice Christianity in schools where not everyone is Christian? (Not a very good analogy, sorry, but still, gets the point across.)

The people of this country will divide into separate religious groups if the government forces another religion on them.

2007-12-19 13:31:14 · answer #9 · answered by Tally 3 · 1 1

nicely for her to % maximum suitable answer merely so she would desire to enable you know techniques your answer sickened her became into rather immature whether, in case you do no longer enable a new child unfold their wings whilst they become older, you may desire to push them out of the religion for good. the situation is that definitely everyone has a acceptable to their very own ideals no count number if or no longer they're your little ones or no longer see you later as they're older. in case you raised them with a good Christian background and did no longer use Christianity as an excuse to control them or tension them into issues, they're going to come to Christianity faster or later whether they did pass off aim for a jointly as.

2016-10-08 23:09:47 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers