That particular issue would be quite a ways down my list. Enviroment, war in Iraq, healthcare are a little higher up.
2007-12-19 08:33:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Laptop Jesus 3.9 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
i might want to confirm Mitt Romney win, yet I concern the GOP will nominate a much-precise conservative who will reason self sustaining electorate to re-decide on Obama. Cain is having a surge in the polls, conservatives like him, yet i do no longer. He has 0 political adventure. i might believe him with being a business enterprise supervisor, yet no longer the President! Perry is basically too blended for me. The media casts him as yet another George W. Bush, he stumbles throughout his words, would not end his techniques, he comes in the time of as boastful and insincere, announcing basically the issues he thinks i want to hearken to. as properly, I dislike his perspectives on unlawful immigration. i do no longer think of he's out of it yet, yet i do unlike him. i do no longer see Republicans looking previous Ron Paul's distant places coverage perspectives. i do no longer see him getting the nomination. on the worst, he will run as a third social gathering candidate and chop up the Republican vote (i.e. Ross Perot) Michelle Bachmann became my early in demand, yet she has no longer grown as a candidate. She is announcing the comparable previous issues, and as such i think of she is on her way out. i think of she might have been wiser to stay in Congress quite than break her acceptance and credibility by a failed bid for the Presidency. i admire Newt Gingrich. He has too many skeletons in the closet for a Presidential nomination (had an affair, have been given divorced, is basically too previous, had debt subject concerns), yet Newt is a astonishing baby-kisser who's familiar with Congress interior and out. He might make an spectacular decision for vp. Jon Huntsman isn't extremely out of it. The media likes him, as perform a little independents. If he has an early win, he may be a ask your self candidate - a gloomy horse. in spite of the shown fact that he's a few thing of a much less-conventional version of Romney. some thing of a reasonable, and a Mormon. yet while Romney is out of it, Huntsman might have a surge.
2016-11-23 15:45:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not any more. I am pro-life. I am also a liberal, but I voted for Bush in 2000 because of his talk on pro-life.
I noticed he didn't touch the issue again until 4 years later, when he used the issue to call us liberals baby killers, and then left the issue alone SINCE then.
I have since learned to take all people running for office and what they say they "stand for" with a grain of salt, and look at when they have been doing for society on non-election years.
2007-12-19 08:41:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by thezaylady 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Every position on every issue is an influence on how I vote, but there are few, if any, single issues that is a deciding factor on how I vote.
2007-12-19 08:37:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't want the government or any other telling any woman or family how to conduct their business. That is a family matter on to be discussed and decided on by the family involved.
I would normally vote for someone that have the same opinion about this subject as mine.
The government should also stay out of the business of telling a family how to conduct their business. This is a very personal and private matter.
I hope this has been of some use to you, good luck.
"FIGHT ON"
2007-12-19 08:39:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by loanmasterone 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not at all. But then again, I intend to vote for the Republican candidate, whoever that it....with the exception of Ron Paul.
If the choice ends up being a Ron Paul or a Democrat, I'm moving to Israel.
2007-12-19 08:35:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by mzJakes 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
There are other issues... but mainly, if the person is a Republican, they will get my vote... cuz I'm a Republican. You see, I've joined the Republican party because those who belong generally believe the same things that I do ... that is why we "hang together!" Democrats do the same... so what's the difference?
Have a blessed day.
2007-12-19 08:59:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by wyomugs 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Since I have had to listen to the liberals/Democrats whine for the past 20 years (my voting years) about how if a Republican wins abortion will be made illegal, and it is still legal, I would have to say no, their position on abortion won't matter to me at all.
2007-12-19 08:35:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It may seem selfish but no, I am focusing on whether or not I believe they can influence job growth and find a solution for health care without increasing taxes on the middle and lower class. These are issues which directly impact my family and at this time are my priorities.
2007-12-19 08:40:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by future dr.t (IM) 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not really, because the law that makes abortion legal will NEVER be changed. The candidates personal beliefs don't really mean anything.
2007-12-19 08:36:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by akc1106 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not much...I'm pro-choice but will vote for a pro-life candidate in the primaries because I support him on other more important issues.
He will not get the not get the nomination (Don't flame me if you people figure out who I'm talking about)
:-)
Of the likely winners, I will most likely vote for a candidate who is pro-choice, but not BECAUSE they are pro-choice.
2007-12-19 08:39:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋