English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-19 07:31:25 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Good grief, I was hoping for some mature answers here but so far there are 5 and none of them are.

2007-12-19 07:36:15 · update #1

17 answers

I dunno, probably. But in Genesis, clothes were a sin.

2007-12-19 07:34:36 · answer #1 · answered by 5th Watcher 4 · 0 2

Nakedness is not a sin, because the sins are named. However, we are to cover ourselves and the bible is full of examples where we are told to do so. In the garden when Adam and Eve were naked they could not see their nakedness, but when their eyes where opened and they could see, they had to be covered.

2007-12-19 07:52:08 · answer #2 · answered by Capri 1230 3 · 2 0

The nakedness was not the sin. The sin was their disobedience to God and listening to Satan and they became "aware" of their nakedness. Adam & Eve chose to disobey God and make their own minds up about what is right and wrong, therefor they were cut off from God's Holy Spirit. We are free moral agents. We can choose God's way or Satan's way.

2007-12-19 07:40:45 · answer #3 · answered by God is my Judge 4 · 3 0

Read Galatians.

The point of the whole book is that believers in Christ are no longer under the law; instead, we are supposed to listen to the guidance of the holy spirit.
If you are a Christian, the holy spirit will tell you if going naked is good or not. I've a strong hunch he'll tell you to put some clothes on, since that's what he tells everyone else :)

2007-12-19 07:37:24 · answer #4 · answered by slinkywizzard 4 · 3 0

The Catholics put a naked image of Jesus in shorts on the cross and ask Catholics to focus on it.

The Protestants view the Catholics' naked image of Jesus in shorts as immodest and the Protestants tend to simply use a cross (with no figure).

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/case_bible/index.html

2007-12-19 08:23:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Absolutely not. Man covered himself after he dis-obeyed God, and his vision was corrupted with guilt.
I wouldn't say wearing clothes or guilt is a sin, but we supposedly wear clothes because of sin, for Adam wanted to be covered and hidden of of shame.

2007-12-19 07:41:14 · answer #6 · answered by Curlyc+ 3 · 3 0

well, it would depend on who would be seeing this nakedness ...it's certainly not a sin to take a shower in your own home. but public indecency is a no-no.

2007-12-19 07:40:37 · answer #7 · answered by Lordy Lordy 3 · 3 0

Being naked is not a sin. Being ashamed of your nakedness is a sin.

2007-12-19 07:37:52 · answer #8 · answered by magix151 7 · 1 1

Peter ran around naked,

Jhn 21:7 Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt [his] fisher's coat [unto him], (for he was naked,) and did cast himself into the sea.

2007-12-19 07:35:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It is the way some people who are as ugly as sin prance around in the nuddy.

2007-12-19 07:39:22 · answer #10 · answered by Boadicea forever 5 · 1 2

If it is so offencive to "The Creator" than babies should leave the womb in trench coats..

2007-12-19 07:38:52 · answer #11 · answered by Blame Amy 5 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers