I think one man who clearly states that his beliefs are separate from his politics is Obama. Although, if he did follow his religion, he would be even more liberal, because his church sanctions gay marriage.
2007-12-19 07:31:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by STFU Dude 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
If you had been listening to the debates you might understand the candidates are running for political office, not a religious office. I would pray that the president would allow his christian beliefs to guide him in decisions, not rule the office by them. Who knows what is in the heart of men, when you ask, who will be the least religious candidate? This country needs some morals, and guidance from above. Too many people these days are from the secular groups that want the US to be a free for all socieity, and anything goes. The 60's set the stage for what we have in society today. Pot heads, lazy people that want the government to take care of them. I hope the president is very religious, and seeks guidance from God and the good sense God bestowed upon him. It's going to take a miracle to pull this country out of the sludge pit it is headed for, if people don't wake up and see it. I'm pulling for Huckabee.
2007-12-19 07:48:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ron Paul is the only one I've noticed who has managed to separate what he believes from what he would do as President. Come on, the man used the Sinclair Lewis facism-with-flag-and-cross quote about Huck's Christmas commercial.
I will have no problem voting for Rep. Paul, a Christian, since he recognizes that he's running for a secular position.
2007-12-19 07:32:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Doc Occam 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
i'm slightly shocked at people who do no longer think of that faith performs a huge section in this years election. somewhat, do they think of that a liberal hockey mom would be on the cost ticket? the only "qualification" she has is that she stumbles around mumbling approximately Jesus and human beings driving dinosaurs. which will help solidify the southern base for McCain. i think of that race and gender are additionally significant components. easily, I view it as a three way tie between race, gender and faith. some women have been annoyed over the Obama/Clinton marketing campaign and merely are not going to vote for him. There are additionally human beings in this united states that merely are not vote casting for a black guy. standard elections are continuously going to be tilted in direction of Republicans. they have a complicit media besides as a extensive element of the voters that thinks that a ineffective Jewish guy will come down on a magic carpet to take them "residing house". through fact of this, even whilst logic is used, it won't count number. it quite is like coaching chinese language Algebra to a undeniable needs scholar.
2016-10-08 22:36:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton.
2007-12-19 07:33:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by magix151 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton.
2007-12-19 07:29:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Maple Sugar 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
None, I'm voting in a write in for Paris Hilton, shes not involved in religion at all.
2007-12-19 07:31:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I'd just throw out the obvious ones: Huckabee and Romney. Then I'd make my choice based on the real issues: poverty, war, the environment, etc.
.
2007-12-19 07:35:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stranger In The Night 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd go with Obama on the left and Ron Paul on the right.
2007-12-19 07:31:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by marbledog 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Kucinich.
Hillary Clinton is in fact Christian and religious:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200611/green-hillary
2007-12-19 07:34:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋