2007-12-19 03:21:04 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
In "The Prophecies" by Ramutsariar, a Hindu book over two thousand years older than the Bible.
2007-12-19 03:28:02 · update #1
You have to know a little hebrew. Adam is the same as Adamah, Adamah in hebrew means from the ground. Since man was made from the ground. So unless that book was written in hebrew then none of it would make sense. Many names and ideas in the bible make sense only if you know hebrew and the name adamah is hebrew. So it must have been that the hebrews were the first to write the bible as it is. There is no hindu book that is 2000 years older than the Bible. Trust me! you are mistaken in your dating. The bible was written over 3300 years ago and they have not found religious doctrines older than the dead sea scrolls. Especially not hindu ones. In fact the hindu religion took many of its ideas from the jewish religion. This is also the case with Buddhism. Even the dalai Lama said that the Jewish religion and the Jewish bible is the corner-stone and root of all religions. Hope this helped.
2007-12-19 03:43:32 · answer #1 · answered by Navid D 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should notice how people lay claim to a "religious event" as their own, it is a clue as to why the world is in the way it is...
Adama, Heva, appears as a Hindu interpretation-translation.
'Adam and Eve" were representitive of a group of non-physical personalities taking form into man for the first time, they did not come a a couple, but a group; the symbolism and intent within Genesis was to show mankinds arrival into the physical world.
2007-12-19 03:28:40 · answer #2 · answered by Adonai 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"Adama" would be (in Hinduism) akin to a life force or emanation of prana. The first physical man in Hinduism is named Manu.
2007-12-19 03:37:50 · answer #3 · answered by neil s 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adama was the first man?
How do Starbuck and Apollo fit into the picture?
And Number Six.... rowr.
2007-12-19 03:31:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Highly doubtful. The Semitic roots are distinct from the Indo-European roots of the coincidentally similar names.
2007-12-19 03:24:31 · answer #5 · answered by Hoosier Daddy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the open minded Christians would say "that's possible"...others on both sides of the fence will simply spout the same rhetoric....
2007-12-19 03:26:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, it was Adam and Eve. Don't believe Hinduism.
2007-12-19 03:25:09 · answer #7 · answered by A Dead Ringer Spy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would like to know more about this, have never heard of it before. Do you have sources or links?
2007-12-19 03:25:13 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋