Do you think Clemens is guilty of taking steroids? If so, do you think he is better or worse than Barry Bonds. Bonds at least admitted to taking the "clear" which he says he thought was flaxseed oil. What do you think?
2007-12-18 18:35:44 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
I'd give the edge to Bonds just because he's a bigger jerk and there's far more evidence against him
2007-12-19 01:32:29 · answer #1 · answered by Benji 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Barry Bonds lied up and down about using steroids and we all know he did! Roger Clemens is a different story. If he lies to a jury and tries to wriggle his way out of this, then I'll put him up there with Barry Bonds. As for right now, I'd say Barry is worse.
2007-12-18 22:55:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off... yes, I feel that Clemens has juiced. I think that they are both equal... although Bonds has lied to a grand jury... Other than that... they both are the same in my eyes... Dirty, rotten cheaters who are too proud to admit to knowingly taking steroids.
Second off, Bonds has never admitted to juicing... He said he used some flaxseed oil that MAY or MAY NOT have contained the clear.
2007-12-18 19:27:30 · answer #3 · answered by Reduviidae 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Theyre interchangeable. Barry Clemens or Roger Bonds you call it.
2007-12-19 00:10:48 · answer #4 · answered by Oz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
neither, bonds is the more likely of the two.. just think.. there claiming clemens took winstrol in 99 on up.. ok not to burst anyones bubble but he was dominant in the 80's and 90's and just from those era's alone he deserves hall of fame status.. if he did take roids then all it did was allow him to pitch longer thats it.. and you cannot tell me since everything wasnt illegal in baseball that 90% of players was on some sort of drug?? thats just BS!! if anything it just leveled the playing field..
but in reality I do not believe Clemens took any type of steroid.
2007-12-18 18:55:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both as bad, both big juicers.
Bonds got singled out as worse due to a rather unlikable public persona (perhaps a bit due to race). It's possible Clemens served 1-2 undeclared 50 game suspensions the past 2 seasons, if there is validity to some reports.
2007-12-18 18:46:25 · answer #6 · answered by Stewie Griffin 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
neither, they are the two very very undesirable human beings you do ought to sense a splash worse for bonds in spite of the shown fact that on account that clemens did the comparable element, its basically bonds call has been obtainable longer, so hes had to take greater crap approximately it, yet im particular clemens gets his due
2016-11-23 14:24:53 · answer #7 · answered by cottom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bonds is the bigger moron because he didn't need steroids, he was a great player, and as long as his body help up, he'd be fine.
Clemens, I understand more, he got older, and wanted to keep playing at a high rate. However, he should have just adjusted his pitching, like Tom Glavine.
2007-12-19 06:17:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol...these Clemens apologists crack me up.both are just as bad.i knew it would come to this when word got out.tell me this Clemens fans...both pettite and Clemens had the same trainer,the Mitchell report used his statement,pettite said it was true....what makes you think he told the truth about pettite but lied about Clemens?why would he?
face it....Clemens is just as dirty as bonds...sure ,neither one tested positive....but you are sure bonds is guilty.Clemens is no choir boy.he did it....move on.another hero shot down....by him self
2007-12-18 19:34:58 · answer #9 · answered by mojo569 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bonds...can he not read the label of what's in the oil...if not than he should quit the idiot award for the year
2007-12-18 21:31:05 · answer #10 · answered by Danny B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋