San Antonio or Phoenix
What yall think?
2007-12-18 16:16:23 · 13 answers · asked by Antwuan (Giants Superbowl XLVI Champs!!!) 7 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Shawn Marion is a great defensive player.
2007-12-18 16:23:14 · update #1
Spurs not by far if there are better than the Suns. And the Suns would have won a championship if Amare wasn't suspended I don't Amare would score 3pts at home he would have scored more than that.
2007-12-18 16:28:06 · update #2
I think the Suns have a chance to win a championship because the Spurs have now giving them some confidence. If your the champions you never the challengers confidence especially the top challeger.
2007-12-18 16:32:27 · update #3
I know Tony Parker didn't play but Spurs fans are goin to use that as an excuse. If they use that as excuse then Suns fans can use Amare and Diaw as an excuse in game 5.
2007-12-18 16:34:48 · update #4
Plus if ur the champions u don't need to use an excuse.
2007-12-18 16:35:39 · update #5
The suns duh and thats my team
2007-12-18 16:18:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Suns may have beaten them....which was a good game on Monday but the thing that separates the Spurs from the Suns is Defense! I like the Suns too, but can't stand the Spurs.....but the Suns beat teams by scoring.
The only player that plays defense for the Suns are. Raja Bell-being, Shawn Marion, Amare Stoudemire, and prob Grant. That's not enough compared to the Spurs.
Bruce Bowen, Francisco Elson, Tim Duncan, Fabricio Oberto, Jacque Vaughn, Finley,Manu Ginobiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii and Matt Bonner. (a little bit)
But hay if the Suns win a championship then I guess everyone will switch to there style of play
2007-12-19 00:26:54 · answer #2 · answered by Amo la pallacanestro 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Just because you like the team does'nt mean they are the best. The spurs almost beat the suns without the nba finals mvp, what more do I say. They are just flat without tony parker and the spurs have owned the suns over the last 3 years. Spurs are by far the best in the west.
2007-12-19 00:23:57 · answer #3 · answered by roger v 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They always beat the Spurs in the regular season but because they dont play defense they always lose when it counts. And besides they beat a Spurs team that wasnt even at full strength they didnt have Parker so I would still say that the Spurs are the better team right now.
2007-12-19 00:30:22 · answer #4 · answered by K.O. Fa sho 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, I love the Suns! They are by far the better team, but the Spurs keep paying off the referees, so they technically have the "better" record.
P.S. The Spurs are cheaters.
2007-12-19 04:32:53 · answer #5 · answered by Flying Fish Nugget 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Suns won the game and are the better team... end of story. They had control of the tempo and played on the road against a team that was undefeated at home this year. The Suns need to continue to win big games like that.
2007-12-19 01:08:40 · answer #6 · answered by EricD 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Spurs are the better team.
2007-12-19 02:30:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spurs. Ginobili, Duncan, and Parker is a better trio than Nash, Stoudemire & Marion, not just because they have rings but because not only can they score but they also can play defense.
2007-12-19 00:22:29 · answer #8 · answered by jose s 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
take a look at tim duncan's stat line. suns still can't handle duncan. skinner did a better job on him than amare. but that's all you can really say about him.
2007-12-19 01:30:20 · answer #9 · answered by m33p0 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
spurs
2007-12-19 21:39:42 · answer #10 · answered by Joseph M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spurs no doubt in my mind.
2007-12-19 00:34:54 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋