If there was a draft, would you be bothered by cowards fleeing the country?

Question

I would encourage them to flee. We don't want them living here anyway. It would be a good way for us to cleanse our polluted population.

Answer 1

Nope... let them flee... who needs cowards mixed within our troops anyhow. Our troops have enough to worry about in battle to be babysitters as well. I agree though, they should loose their citizenship and not be allowed back in.

What libs can't understand is that it isn't always about their understanding of the policy. It is about the country and supporting the country. It is a duty as they have enjoyed the freedom she has offered them their whole lives.

Also.. to the uneducated that think during voluntary enlistment you must enlist or you can not hold opinions that support our troops and our efforts please get a clue. Support and service is found in many ways. You don't need to be a member of a sports team to be a fan... I am not a volunteer for the purple heart yet I donate every time they call. And before pointing fingers at politicians families... Chelsea Clinton did not serve nor did Kerry or Edwards kids. It is not mandatory. What is sick is you have an admitted COWARD in Clinton who ran away when asked to serve his country yet, you people still voted him in as Commander and Chief. No wonder he did NOTHING when the USS Cole and the WTC was attacked.

Here is the difference... if called to serve (via the draft) Romney's kids probably would serve where as others would not.

Answer 2

The fact is they could serve in noncombat duty. Didn't we let a handful come back from Canada, and that was it a handful during the Nam. I Also agree with Cinner and like her hat.

If they will not serve even in that capacity, then by a means let them cross our southern border, where they will ......... Take care. By the way they will not be able to do that when the security fence is up.

Answer 3

I would be bothered....they should stay and fight the draft.

"AMENDMENT XIII
Passed by Congress January 31, 1865. Ratified December 6, 1865.

Note: A portion of Article IV, section 2, of the Constitution was superseded by the 13th amendment.

Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."

Answer 4

I'm still bothered by draft dodgers of the Vietnam war-cowards

Answer 5

Bill Clinton was the FIRST PARDONED FEDERAL FELON to serve as president of the United States of America!

http://www.tonyrogers.com/humor/clinton_record.htm

Pardoned Jan. 21, 1977 by Jimmy Carter, after signing enlistment papers and taking the oath of enlistment, he refuses to report for duty.

The first fugitive from justice to run for governor in the state of Arkansas.

Need I say more?

.

Answer 6

Yeah - its time to thin the herd anyway. Don't let the doorknob hit em on the way out.

Answer 7

I would not be bothered by people who felt that strongly, just as I was not bothered by people of my generation leaving to avoid the draft while I enlisted. They felt, and I felt, that the Viet Nam war was based on lies, was illegal and immoral. But the warrior does not get to pick his fights, so when told to go, I went. I served honorably and well and would do it again if asked. But I do not begrudge others who decline. Nor do I cheapen myself by calling them names. It actually takes a LOT of courage to leave one's country.

Answer 8

if they're dumb enough to Want to leave, why should we want them in our armies anyways? most of them would be liberals who wouldn't be smart enough to figure out a gun anyways...

Answer 9

No, people that don't want to fight someone else's war shouldn't have to. That's why conscription is a bad policy, you treat your citizens like expendable cannon fodder.

Answer 10

I'm with you. Let them flee but they should never be allowed back in.