Why does something that granted the nobility more power over the monarch equate to a "birth certificate of freedom"? However, it is a famous piece of history, is quite rare, so is thus quite valuable to collectors.
2007-12-18 17:09:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Caninelegion 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
hang on... there was only 1 magna carta, signed by king John in 12 15 at runnymeade...
or do you know something we dont?
2007-12-18 23:35:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dam why its just the magna carta does the U.s. constitution still follow the MAGNA CARTA?
2007-12-18 23:29:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats way to much money, if your that rich donate to some charites help some starving unprivledged kids, IN AMERICA. Give that to a muesem, and give the 22 billion dollars to a charity or help people that need help. I know it seems harsh but kinda seems like a waste of money, i think it should be in goverment possesion and displayed like the decleration of independence
2007-12-18 23:31:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Don A 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like the concept of an "original copy."
2007-12-18 23:30:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by not too creative 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
What a waste of money,when there is people starving in his world.No sense whatsoever.
2007-12-19 03:38:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Busy Bee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd have sold my copy for half that. Still will you know.
2007-12-18 23:49:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Thats not breaking news! I heard that hours ago!!
2007-12-18 23:35:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
wow, I feel sorry for the person who bought that...what a waste of their money!
2007-12-18 23:31:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by stone throwing junkie 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
"original copy" is an oxymoronic impossibility.
2007-12-19 13:44:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋