2007-12-18 14:44:45 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Assuming your talking about the current...Time will tell
2007-12-18 14:49:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 7⤋
I honestly believe he had to do what he had to do.
75% of people who believe he was a bad president have never opened a book on their own, or never have had to make a decision for themself. They believe that the world thinks he was a bad president so he follows what he thinks will make them not look dumb. Of course reality is that he cannot hide when he makes an opinion and the person is so oblivious even a simple fool can question him and win.
Thats 75% of them, 25% honestly believe he was a bad president. Not because they hate him, but because they would have done things differently which is honestly ok to believe. We all have our own way of running thinks in our lifetime, we all manage our own decisions. Democrats and Republicans are the same things as Ford, Chevy, and Toyota.
No matter what there is going to be a person who hates each other with a passion, then there will be the followers. Ford things they are better then everyone and so does Toyota and Chevy. Then there is the ones who like 2 out of 3.
Then there is the people who hate ALL of them and prefer a car instead of a truck.
Well it's their choice.
Politics is just another debate. If you believe that the president was a bad president thats your choice, I will always believe he was a good one. I've had friends and family die in the war and I know what they died doing.
:)
have a good day
2007-12-19 01:13:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
In some senses, yes. Foreign policy, especially to the growing powers of India and China, will have positive affects for many years to come. However, the huge government spending and expansions of the federal government will haunt us for a long time too. He had the disadvantage of being President at the same time the Islamo-fascists got serious and his decisions have proved highly unpopular both in the USA and abroad. I don't know about good or bad; average, I'd say. Certainly better then his predecessor and the lasting damage that his foreign and domestic policy ushered in adding to his 21 indictments on federal crimes by a special prosecuter and the damage that did to morale in this country.
2007-12-19 01:21:26 · answer #3 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
He probably wasnt the worst you have had by he was no means good.
Most of the free world think he is a joke which is why many countries are turning their backs on the US financially and going to the Euros.
Instead of spending Americans tax payers money on social, education and welfare reforms, free health, economic and environmental reforms and better standard of living for his citizens,like the rest of the free world, he choose to embrol you in a stupid war against an enemy that has been winning for years now at a huge financial cost to your nation.
Americans probably are not aware that your allies such as Australia, New Zealand , Canada and England have free medical and hospital that includes dentistry, free education to end of high school and subsidised university funds.
They also have good welfars systems and standards of living across the board.
Your grandchildren will be paying taxes to pay for this Iraqi war and why ...so GWB can finally get some recognition from his father.
The rest of the world has seen it, your enemy was never Iraq, your enemy has been and always will be Saudi Isrealia.
If you want to take the war to terrorists then this is where your country needs to start.
2007-12-19 01:10:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
i believe he was a good president being put the place he was...he had no choice but to go after the people he did after what happend on 9-11 no way in hell would i want to be the person in charge of a few million people at that time...knowing how many were just killed and having no clue what could happen next!
if he could run for a 3rd term i would proably vote for him
p.s. if you give me the thumbs down i would LOVE to know what you would have done being in his shoes! really there is no right he did the best he could w/ what he could
2007-12-18 23:29:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Bush 43 is one of the worst in history. His father Bush 41 was smart enough to not occupy Iraq. He lost reelection partly because he raised taxes and partly because Perot took away votes. Bush 41 did what he had to do with taxes. Bush 43 is hiding all the money he is spending. The current defecit doesn't even include the long term loans that have been taken out to pay for the war. They will come due during the next president term and then they will blame it on the next president.
Bush 43 is either evil or incompetent. Bush 41 was a mediocre president.
2007-12-18 23:08:04 · answer #6 · answered by Tomsriv 5 · 4⤊ 7⤋
Why not?
With Captain America?
Never fear.
Always there for you.
Just fine tune the jig-saw puzzles.
Will make it to the home-run.
Luke 8.10,17
What do you think?
2007-12-19 04:11:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
in his time in office.. i think he spent like 1/2 a trillon dollars... which can pay and give free health care like canada and pay university tution for anyone who wanted to go to university and way more ++++++++ and more +++++++ stuff for 1/2 a trill... omg stop the war... they don't want democracy so why should you (i am canadian) force them to have democracy????
2007-12-18 23:28:13 · answer #8 · answered by Firebird 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Come on seriously you have to ask? I think he was the worst president in history! ~V.
2007-12-18 22:53:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 8⤋
past tense - BAAAD
present tense - still BAAAD
future tense - who knows?
2007-12-18 23:09:00 · answer #10 · answered by ★ yaya ★ 7 · 2⤊ 7⤋