why? and please explain
2007-12-18 14:26:42 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
The Big Bang theory is very logical, but the problem lies in trying to make the concepts accessible to the lay public by conveying them in analogies that relate them to more familiar concepts. Ultimately, the reason that so much popular science writing falls short, including that on Big Bang cosmology, is that few people are willing to devote serious study to mathematics and science, and plumb the internal consistencies of difficult subjects.
2007-12-18 14:41:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
It is not illogical in that no scientist pretends to know what preceded or caused the "big bang."
In other words, absolutely nothing comes from absolutely nothing. Before the "grand unfoldment," there was Some Thing, perhaps Mind, perhaps Matter, but there always was Some Thing. This is God, in the etymological sense of "God" as "pourer," "giver."
Thus, the "big bang" theory is incomplete, and must necessarily be so, until science is able to move through the supposed singularity to deal with the Some Thing.
"Climb the Highest Mountain," Mark Prophet, has some insight as to this.
2007-12-18 19:01:34 · answer #2 · answered by j153e 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ok, i will flow basic on you on account which you're basically 13. initially, there's a huge bang concept, and there is an evolution concept. the two are thoroughly unrelated, different than that the 1st is mandatory for the 2nd to happen. won't be able to hardly have issues evolving if the universe never banged, precise? 2nd, it is >conceivable< that some 'god', for loss of a greater suitable term, began each and every thing off, and then basically stepped aside to allow issues take their path. conceivable, yet no longer mandatory. basically sayin'. third, there is no information that any god exists, neither is there any disproof, and there never would be any. The bible would not instruct something, different than that an prolonged time in the past some men wrote down some stuff and it have been given accrued into one e book that some human beings take as scripture. finally, technology may be relied on. in case you already know the scientific technique, it is self obtrusive that it is infallible while precise used, and while improperly used, the errors is quickly found by rival scientists. in spite of the shown fact that, no area of ANY scientific concept says "....and for this reason, no god exists." technology bargains basically with the organic international, and the supernatural is left to religionists to argue approximately. one element greater - thank you lots for worrying approximately marvelous spelling and grammar. it is an extremely uncommon high quality at present (basically take a seem at countless the posts in this internet site), and a great style of folk do savor it.
2016-11-23 13:53:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In 1927 Belgian physicist Georges Lamaitre, the father of the big bang, said the origin of the universe was a “primordial egg” which exploded eventually creating our universe as we see it now.
Where did this primordial egg come from? And since when have explosions resulted in such perfection? Every explosion in the history of mankind has caused destruction and chaos.
The Big Bang THEORY cannot be proven or considered a "scientific law" till these two questions, and many more are answered.
2014-08-14 06:02:44 · answer #4 · answered by MillerCoolCAt 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is illogical. Why u ask? well bcuz. What came b4 the big bang? How could an explosion just happen all of a sudden from nothing and make the whole universe? I think space has always been around. No beginning and no end.
2007-12-18 17:13:44 · answer #5 · answered by trix 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a more logical than creation thats for sure. I remember in the 7th grade I asked my science teacher about the Big Bang theory and he completely denied it. What a moron.
2007-12-18 15:47:32 · answer #6 · answered by TheGuyThatHas 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The basic reason it is illogical is known as infinite regress:
If every atom exploded from one object, what caused the object to explode?
Lets just say the answer is "it was destablizing" (the explanation works whatever the answer is)
Well, if it is destablizing, it must have been more stable the farther back in time you look. Well, eventually, if you are becoming more and more stable, their is a point reached where you are perfectly stable, and it is impossible to become more so. Matter in this condition does not ever destablize without an outside force causing it to do so. So now we must search for the force causing it to happen. Eventually you must reach something that cannot be explained by science, that contradicts a purely "matter in motion" theory of the world. It must come to an event that is caused by something (or someone) that is not bound to the laws of physics. This something must be driven by its will. If this something/someone is causing everything basically just because he wants to, this must mean that there is basically a rule that matter is bound by, a rule above all other rules, that this beings will shall always be obeyed.
2007-12-18 15:05:37 · answer #7 · answered by oddball.2002 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The big bang theory is somewhat logical, but flawed. It does not explain why there are multiple galaxies moving at different rates and possibly different ages. If you accept the concept of MULIPLE BIG BANGS, it all falls into place.
2007-12-18 16:07:46 · answer #8 · answered by loryntoo 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
My answer is: The Big Bang is illogical, because,how, and why, did the Big Bang "decide" to create itself ?
2007-12-18 16:50:30 · answer #9 · answered by ROBERT P 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No 'Big Bang' is mentioned in the Bible. Therefore, it did not occur.
2007-12-20 10:39:08 · answer #10 · answered by Hate Boy! 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋