2007-12-18 14:09:56 · 7 answers · asked by Marvie S 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
The energy would be released all at one time instead of in smaller steps. It is not controlled. Think of this in terms of burning gasoline in a car. The gasoline is burned a little puff of gasoline at a time. It's controlled and it moves the car down the road. The tank of gasoline can last for hours. You could also burn the gasoline all at once. Just throw a match into the tank. It releases the energy all at once. The car will go places, but not where you want it to, and not in a controlled manner.
2007-12-18 14:13:52 · answer #1 · answered by ecolink 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If cellular respiration took place in a single step instead of many sequential steps, then the chemical bond energy of glucose would be dissipated as heat energy and little would be available for producing high energy phosphoanhydride bonds in ATP.
2007-12-18 14:15:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just learned this. There would be a problem because The cell wouldn't get all of the energy that it could and would waste some.
2007-12-18 14:14:26 · answer #3 · answered by Wesley 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i be attentive to you will possibly take out the 6O2 and the 6H2O. yet i'm uncertain what you will possibly positioned lower back in to change it. i be attentive to that the waste products of fermentation are CO2 and alcohol or lactate. purely uncertain what the equation may well be. Sorry.
2016-11-04 00:16:38 · answer #4 · answered by trippi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would go by so quickly that you would have no time to enjoy it.
2007-12-18 14:12:16 · answer #5 · answered by Merve 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ummm... we would die...
2007-12-18 14:12:30 · answer #6 · answered by starburst9207 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No other steps to continue the cycle? I dunno.
2007-12-18 14:11:52 · answer #7 · answered by Colin 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋