English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

then two days later is appointed as the court appointed attorney for an opposing party in the case? Just FYI the attorney never signed a retainer agreement with the first party while discussing the issues of the case over the phone but she did give legal advise and her opinion on the case.

2007-12-18 12:25:39 · 6 answers · asked by lahockeyg 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

This is a non-parental child custody case...the attorney is now representing the child in this case.

2007-12-18 12:34:15 · update #1

Thank you for your speedy and helpful responses!!!

2007-12-18 12:36:23 · update #2

6 answers

Very probably, yes.

But the question's a little confusing. How was there an 'opposing party' and then a court appointment?

As a general rule, you are entitled to a court appointed attorney only in a criminal matter, where the "opposing party" is the DA.

Richard

2007-12-18 12:31:04 · answer #1 · answered by rickinnocal 7 · 0 0

The attorney should have told the judge who appointed him that he had a conflict.

2007-12-18 12:41:58 · answer #2 · answered by beez 7 · 0 0

if no money was exchanged then the attorney was not your attorney, therefore no conflict,.....

2007-12-18 13:25:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm no expert but it stinks conflict

2007-12-19 04:59:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

agreed with Funk...recuse himself. You can tell the Judge about this too.

2007-12-18 12:40:15 · answer #5 · answered by Empress Jan 5 · 0 0

Yes it would be a conflict of interest.
always HAVE YOUR OWN LAWYER,IF YOU DON'T LIKE HIM,FIRE HIM HIRE A DIFFERENT ONE.

2007-12-18 12:35:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers