English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't understand why people don't like Hillary. Is it because she's a woman and people don't want a woman leading the country or because of her husband which I thought was a great president by the way?

Personally I like her and I see nothing wrong with her being president. I think it is time we see a woman as president anyway and she has been in the senate for a long time so I think she knows what she is doing.

I may get some hate responses for this, but I AM voting for her. :)

2007-12-18 11:57:23 · 21 answers · asked by UCLA kid, Go BRUINS!!! 1 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

Majority of people do like Hillary Clinton. Only evil Republican-Neocons do not like her and keep asking those provocative questions.

2007-12-18 13:01:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

Her 'womanliness' or lack thereof has nothing to do with it. Both of the Clintons have been involved in scandals ever since they became well known nationally. We're all sick of the Clintons' condescending attitude and insulting our intelligence with the lies, denials, lack of memory about all negative events surrounding her actions, arguing over the meaning of 'is.' Some of her positions are socialist - free health care, government baby pensions, seizing oil companies' profits.

Then let's face it, that shrill laugh where she sounds like the Joker is enough to make your skin crawl. She's fake and changes her position within one sentence sometimes. And no one likes a gravy train. She would never have even become a senator without Clinton as a last name. She's just not cut out for American politics. She can play the victim card all she wants, no one's buying it.

2007-12-18 12:07:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

First of all, Luke vote for who you think will do the best for our country for the next 4 years. If you think that is Hillary then vote for her and don't let my opinion of her disuade you from your allegiance.

Personnaly, I'm voting against that power hungry Machiavelian succubus(even though she maybe the smartest candidate on the ballot). In my humble opinion she is running to expand her own prestige and not that of our country's. Just this last week she tried to appeal to gun owners and portray herself as pro second amendment. Frankly I feel this is a poor attempt to decieve political moderates and those of us slightly right of center that we should vote for her. I'm not that easily duped and my memory is better than that.

Just my opinion,

Cheers
A.C.

PS sincerely though Kudos on sticking to your guns, Luke allot of people just go with the flow.

2007-12-18 14:27:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

She serves the interests of Corporations and in fact leads among all Presidential candidates in collecting money from Banks, Private Health Insurance Companies and the Defense Industry. She is the most Hawkish of the Democrats, voting for the saber rattling Kyl-Lieberman Ammendment that called the Iranian Revolutionary Guard "Terrorists," and she was influential in supporting her husbands bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999.

"Mrs. Clinton had been instrumental in persuading Bill to attack Yugoslavia, according to multiple writers. Biographer Gail Sheehy wrote in “Hillary’s Choice” (p. 345): “On March 21, 1999, Hillary expressed her views by phone to the president. ‘I urged him to bomb [Yugoslavia].’ ” Bill was indecisive. She invoked the Holocaust, alluding to claims of mass killings by Milosovic and his men, and asked, “What do we have NATO for if not to defend our way of life?” (Originally it was to defend western Europe against a possible Soviet attack.) Days later the president gave the go-ahead for war, thereby usurping the constitutional prerogative of Congress.

The Milosovic-massacre tale (which Senator Clinton repeated in her 2002 Senate speech) was subsequently debunked by several European pathological teams. The Clinton-NATO air raids, however, killed a couple of thousand civilians. A year later Amnesty International charged that international law was violated by indiscriminate bombings."

I am a Democrat and would sooner vote for Ron Paul than vote for Hillary Clinton. However I'm supporting the one Democrat who voted against the illegal Invasion of Iraq and voted against the blank checks funding the U.S. Military Occupation of Iraq: Dennis Kucinich.

2007-12-18 12:41:40 · answer #4 · answered by Richard V 6 · 4 0

I do not agree with her policy positions.

You name it, health-care, social security, abortion, affirmative action, taxes, national defense, war on terror, you name it and she is a socialist.

She is VERY condescending to others, bitchy, and insincere. She's a princess, who feels she is owed the White House.

Most especially, I CAN NOT stand the tone of her voice. It is like fingernails on a chalkboard. The tone reeks pompous, arrogance, an elitism.

Any other woman would be better than her. She would become more polarizing than Dick Cheney. The country will be fiercely divided and at war with Queen Hilliary in charge.
"Give them cake to eat"! Pathetic.

2007-12-18 12:30:35 · answer #5 · answered by Lives7 6 · 7 0

She has NOT been a senator for a long time. What 6 years maybe?

2007-12-18 12:05:42 · answer #6 · answered by GRUMPY 4 · 2 0

She's a criminal, a liar, a feminazi, a socialist and anything else you can think of.

It's not because she is a woman, ha, she's more of a man than any of those dem candidates running.

If you see nothing wrong then that is pure ignorance. Do a history check on her past and anyone that still chooses to vote for her even though she has a horrible deceiving past, then shame on them.

2007-12-18 12:04:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 10 3

She's a liar and will say anything to get elected.

"...she is cold, calculating and devoid of human warmth," said Dennis Goldford, professor of political science at Drake University in Des Moines."

2007-12-18 12:05:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

I don't like her idea of freedom. I like my freedom, she would like to take it away from me on many levels; too many for my comfort.

I would vote for Rice if she ran, so you see I don't dislike Hillary because of her gender.

2007-12-19 03:45:38 · answer #9 · answered by Moneta_Lucina 4 · 2 0

she is more worthy of becoming president than obama, but i don't want her to be president because that position shouldn't be given to a woman. i can tell you many reasons why, but what would it matter if your'e going to vote for her. keep this in mind though.....giuliani is the man, and more of a man than hillary can ever try to be.

2007-12-18 12:06:13 · answer #10 · answered by Danny 1 · 2 6

Good luck with voting for her.What happens when she loses?
Join the 40% who will vote for her.That's not enough to win with.

2007-12-18 12:09:28 · answer #11 · answered by ak6702 7 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers