USA Today spins the story to include Republicans, but ultimately this is a woman led democratic congress. They are a do nothing congress because democrats can't grasp the concept of 'compromise'.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2007-12-17-congresspoll_N.htm
2007-12-18 11:31:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is much better to Democrat Congress to nothing than having them expand on their income redistribution plans.
2007-12-18 11:37:50 · answer #1 · answered by phillipk_1959 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
But are people surprised. I mean, honestly, the Democrats always pander to minority groups, homosexuals, different religious groups, enviromentalists,the little guy,etc,etc,etc. They try be everyones best friend, telling them, they believe, in their cause, and will do everything they can to help. That if they get in office things will change...and guess what? Nothing. Nothing ever gets done. They will always complain it is the republicans are the problem and people will believe em. Problem is, they don't do anything. They are the party of DO NOTHINGS. As I have said before, should I feel sorry for minorities because the democrats do nothing for them, or be happy that their one sidedness actually works against them. Why minorities predominantly stick with the democratic party is a joke. If these groups split themselves amoung the parties there would be a better chance that politicians would fight to keep their votes by putting helpful legislation through. But I guess, people will be mindless robots and vote how mommy and daddy tell them too. Read, listen, engage, in politics and the issues of today. Find out both sides and decide for yourself what you believe. What your values are. Then vote. Voting blindly is a joke. So is Pelosi and her do nothing bunch of elected officials. She is not a good representation of what women want to represent them. As the first women, she has been a let down.
2007-12-18 19:46:40 · answer #2 · answered by amber s 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
shes definitely setting a record...of the lowest approval rating ever. her political strategy should come with a warning label. i suppose in her own twisted way shes proud. hopefully someday shell learn of the damage shes caused to this country.
2007-12-18 19:41:31 · answer #3 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
She should be very proud of it compared to the rubber stamp record setting congress that preceeded the current one.
2007-12-18 19:37:19 · answer #4 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It is hard to accomplish anything when the President uses his veto authority 100% of the time. Shouldn't the President be ready to compromise too?
2007-12-18 19:36:41 · answer #5 · answered by Herb 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Nancy would make a better bartender. LOL She is CLUELESS!
2007-12-18 19:43:37 · answer #6 · answered by Jay J 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
She's got ice in her veins
2007-12-18 19:40:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
That is why they have the lowest approval rating ever.
2007-12-18 19:35:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yes. Bush is the decider, he does not compromise.
2007-12-18 19:35:30 · answer #9 · answered by wisdomforfools 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
maybe she should put the burka back on.
2007-12-18 19:37:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋