2007-12-18 10:25:07 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Mr. Know It All : you dont know what your talking about.
2007-12-18 10:32:09 · update #1
Michael: you dont read do you. stop smoking that crack.
2007-12-18 10:34:47 · update #2
no. and idiots like mr. know nothing, and his alter ego, and cronies, will never be able to get off the pipe and see the truth
2007-12-18 19:20:05 · answer #1 · answered by mumtaz 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If there's any sort of market crash when a Dem is in the WH, the Repubs will blame that Dem. If there is recovery when that Dem is in the WH, the Repubs will claim it was because of W, even if that recovery happens four years into the Dem's term.
And if a Dem is in the WH come 2009, the Repubs will howl over the budget that goes into 2010, calling that Dem a "tax and spend Democrat" who is giving it all away to "welfare".
But it won't have been a budget approved by that Dem. It will have been W's last budget approval.
2007-12-18 13:16:47 · answer #2 · answered by Lynne D 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmm....when the economy was booming and Clinton stepped into office, did he give Bush 1 the credit? no.
i expect the same when the next prez steps into office. the economy will not crash, but the opposite will take place, and whoever's elected will be credited for it.
it's called tax relief. do you know what that is? it means we keep more of our own money... you don't like it? move to canada.
oh yeah, and here in oregon we have a 5 1/2% unemployment rate, one of the highest in the country... the economy is peachy, think of something else to hate on bush about.
2007-12-18 10:55:35 · answer #3 · answered by normajean_81 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I expect that the next administration will own all of Bush's problems Iraq and the deficit being the big ones. It seems to me that as far as the deficit goes that only solution will be a tax increase coupled with a decrease in spending. Not a pretty picture politically perhaps it may be better not to be the party in control when the you know what hits the fan. Nothing solid here just an observation.
2007-12-18 10:32:32 · answer #4 · answered by Bob O 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
who's King Hussein? Bush had Saddam Hussein hanged as quickly as we wrongfully invaded and destroyed Iraq. he's ineffective, alongside with a million or so electorate. the yankee human beings have been stupid sufficient to reelect Bush after this collosal blunder. we are those responsible for the unlawful warfare, the economic device, or maybe though else happens on our watch.
2016-11-23 13:13:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I seriously doubt the economy will crash because of the government's mindless spending, the government has been horrible with its money for decades. Aslong as the people we owe money to dont all instantly demand we pay them we are fine.
2007-12-18 10:54:43 · answer #6 · answered by DREW 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Strange, but in reality, the economy is doing rather well. Recent news articles have said: "Retail sales suggest the economy may be stronger than expected." "US retail sales surged during November making a surprisingly strong broad-based climb that suggests the economy might not be as weak as feared." "Meanwhile, US wholesale prices soared last month at their fastest pace since the Nixon administration." How can that be when you libs are constantly trying to make the public fearful of some sort of economic catastrophe? I thought it was the Republicans who were trying to make people fearful?
2007-12-18 10:33:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Republicans as a whole aren't at fault. It's those in power as we speak.
It's the corrupt Bush Administration.
It's the Democrat controlled congress and senate for STILL giving the administration funding for the war and other ridiculous projects.
It's our skewed Judicial system that rewards criminals and punishes victims.
And it's OURS for not putting these idiots in line.
2007-12-18 10:40:18 · answer #8 · answered by Hellion 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It takes the President, the Congress and the Senate to pass any spending bills for one. Two our economy is tanked due to the begining of world trade agreements from Clinton and Bush. I do not and will not believe that one party is at fault. Everyone in Washington is at fault for letting down the common man. Those who continue to vote in the same morons Kennedy, Rockefeller, Helms was a great one you get the point are just as much to blame.
2007-12-18 10:30:58 · answer #9 · answered by brianandchristinenickel 3 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Don't think anyone will take the blame. Don't know is it will crash. But things do not look too good. Scary part is we are getting primed for an economic take over. Who do you think has the assets to control and buy out Americas financial assets which are on the verge of colapse.
2007-12-18 10:33:17 · answer #10 · answered by Tom C 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The stock market downturn of 98-99 (its a fact thats when it occured, not some misinformation) and the housing slump (present) have a ton to do with it.
Historians will look back and explain this is as a wide spread economic policy problem and trade issue, not a partisan issue like the idiots and talking heads like to discuss presently.
Last I checked, both parties have quite a bit of responsibility when it comes to the state of the economy.
Otherwise wouldn't all democratic controlled states economies be growing at a solid rate if its solely a repub problem?
2007-12-18 10:30:32 · answer #11 · answered by Phil M 7 · 6⤊ 4⤋