how many of those dems who gave their approval would today announce they are pleased with that decision and proud of what bush has done in iraq?
zero?
2007-12-18 09:29:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
None of them would ever admit that Bush had ever done anything right in his life.
But it doesn't change the fact that Hillary and John Kerry, along with many others, voted to authorize Bush to go into Iraq.
And guess what? It was the right thing to do. And we are winning, too!
No matter what the liberal media may tell you.
Vote for Rudy!
2007-12-18 09:33:14 · answer #1 · answered by Rick K 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Yes I can answer this, none of those dems would at this time admit that George Bush has ever done anything that was right
This in no way changes the FACT that they did indeed state thier support of the president based on the same information that the President had at the time. They will argue any way that they think they can to back out of this now.
Get over your ridiculous notion that the liberal left is somehow the answer to all our problems, they are merely one side of a bad penny called government
2007-12-18 09:46:07 · answer #2 · answered by avatar2068 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Umm. Politicians.
Politicians = Liars
It wouldn't matter if a politician STILL felt it was the right thing to do. The public is too down on the idea for any of them to admit it. Save the one who has nothing to lose since he's out next year anyhow.
Let's try this lesson one more time.
Politicians = Liars
Don't talk to them, don't go to their campaign parties, and certainly don't believe a word that comes out of their mouth. Just vote in what you think is the lesser of two evils like we always do and move on.
2007-12-18 12:52:28 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You liberals are short of memory. It was unanimous vote and support by the liberals (marxists) for "Bill "I sold secrets to communist china" Klinton to bomb a baby food factory to pull attention away from his problem with a certain woman. You can look into the record and see that when comrad Klinton was president and trying to detract attention away from his problems that all democratic politicians spoke on record about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. You lefties were OK with bombing a baby food factory and killing innocent workers (it's OK because they weren't your beloved terrorists). But when the current administration is fighting your friends (terrorist's, yeah, I know how much you believe that they are peaceful people), you now want to give them full Constitutional rights....
2007-12-18 10:43:48 · answer #4 · answered by G T 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would hope none. The decision was based on misinformation at best and lies at worst. If that had been known at the time I don't even think the republicans would have supported the war.
2007-12-18 09:41:00 · answer #5 · answered by Robert S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That question makes no sense. It's a fact that the majority of congressional Dems voted for the authority to use force in Iraq. I don't particularly care what they think today, as it's immaterial to the vote they cast in 2002.
Your "question" calls to mind the old response to a "what if" question: If my aunt had testicles, she'd be my uncle.
2007-12-18 09:35:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hind sight 20/20. We have been bamboozled and no one else to blame but our politicians. Couldn't you smell Vietnam in the speeches before the invasion?
2007-12-18 09:51:14 · answer #7 · answered by edubya 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
What About Lieberman, or have the Dems disavowed him?
2007-12-18 09:33:27 · answer #8 · answered by QBeing 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No, no, you're not allowed to change your mind once you've made a decision. Don't you know that? If you voted to authorize Bush to use force (if necessary - two words Republicans love to forget), then you have to be absolutely happy with every detail of the way he chose to execute that authority. Because the Dems were supposed to know he was a demented, mentally handicapped child who thought he was playing with plastic trucks in a sandbox, instead of putting people's lives at risk.
They were supposed to know that he was relying on faulty, old intelligence reports when he supplied them with data that said Iraq had stockpiles and stockpiles of WMDs that they were planning on using against U.S. interests.
They were supposed to know that he'd be inflexible in his approach to the war, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that it was - IS - futile.
That's why the Dems are to blame. They should have known that the most powerful man on the planet needed to be watched like a two-year-old in a toy store.
2007-12-18 09:35:53 · answer #9 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 2⤊ 7⤋
The record speaks for itself, and none would admit being wrong, even about the surge that worked so well!
2007-12-18 09:36:02 · answer #10 · answered by oldmarine08 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋