on both sides.
every four years we elect a multimillionaire who somehow convinces the public he/she understands the needs of the average American---and everytime we get screwed.
next year will be no different......and again we will pretend to be outraged
2007-12-18 09:09:00 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
So we should not have a president?
2007-12-18 09:18:37 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul? he's nice the place he could be. I even have heard his rhetoric, and he remains following "the social gathering line". Jimmy Carter replaced into no longer a liar, and that i assume i'm proving the element for you. Liars can run circles around "truthful" adult adult males thrice in the previous they be attentive to they have been had. Reagen replaced into blessed with the aid of fact the super communicator and purely approximately 85 % of each and every thing he reported replaced into fabrication. confident wager this is want human beings want. I propose history shows that besides. each and every actual reformer from historic Rome to this element, has been murdered. So in case you assert you will create replace then truthfully do it . this is a stressful act to stay with.
2016-11-03 23:39:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It seems to be easier to swallow a lie than the truth. The lies are usually what we want to happen, so people let themselves believe it. The truth is harder and not as much fun. People want things fixed, but if that fix involves taxes or any other infringement on our lives, then that is too hard so they go with the person who promises, "No new taxes." And people don't do their own research. They believe attack ads on TV and never dig beyond them to find out if there is any basis in reality. We're not as far up the evolutionary ladder as we'd like to think. We're still attracted to shiny objects and chest beating. So that's what wins.
2007-12-18 09:44:59 · answer #3 · answered by Jareth's Trousers 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Money talks and bull**** walks. It has always been that way. Look at George W. Bush; he needed his father and his brother (who is a Governor of FL) to win the 2000 election. Hilary is no different, she needs her husband and the scary thing is, is that she might be the next President.
2007-12-18 09:36:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have 3 great candidates that are not proven liars. The people keep electing whoever spends the most on campaigns.
2007-12-18 09:16:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ignorance in that Americans instead of making a change go for what ever sounds best or meets their own simple interest.
Ron Paul 08'
2007-12-18 09:54:36 · answer #6 · answered by Spac 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey we have not elected any one to the presidency since 1996. Check your facts!
2007-12-18 09:41:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a function of the sheeple principal. Sheeple are easily pleased and easily distracted. They are afraid of so many things. Sheeple are sheeple not tigers.
2007-12-18 09:34:01 · answer #8 · answered by JIM 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We have to elect a politician, so I guess the answer would have to be yes.
2007-12-18 09:11:20 · answer #9 · answered by Sordenhiemer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes its very sad, that the power hungry money Mogul's are the ones that get in. it really scary and sad, that the almighty dollar rules in this country,and that this country put's in who they want, I'm sure alot of our tax money goes to the wrong candidates, I for one will not be voting democrat, way too dangerous!!!!!! way too socialistic!!!!! way too communistic!!! way too scary!!!!!
2007-12-18 09:16:51 · answer #10 · answered by poopsie 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because we have been conditioned to be namby pamby traitorous America hating pethetic losers.
2007-12-18 09:13:27 · answer #11 · answered by speed__phreak 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋