He can keep up the fight on terror.
He can keep the nation together.
He can keep our economy strong like he has been doing the past 7 years.
2007-12-18 05:47:41 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Oh Jesus H. Christ, haven't you had enough punishment from GW Bush?
Give the country a break from this imbecile, will you?
2007-12-18 05:59:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Umm...do you understand how that position would work? Firstly a prime minister is from the party that holds the majority in the legislative branch so for him to even have a chance the Republicans would have to take back both houses which isn't all too likely. Secondly after the Republicans won they would have to decide that he was to be their choice for the position which would be highly unlikely as he is about as popular as having a rash on your balls. Also what powers would such a position entail? The president does what the prime minister of most governments does though he works a bit less with the legislature and has probably a bit more power. Aside from that you are also making poor assumptions about President Bush, because he has done more to divide this country than any other president ever. The economy is also shaky right now with the stock market being erratic and the housing market bombing. I happen to also believe he has taken many mis-steps in his fight on terror which have cost us men and money that were needlessly wasted.
2007-12-18 06:02:06 · answer #2 · answered by UriK 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The work that creating that position entails would far outweigh the benefit of keeping any person in the government. The whole reason our government was set up the way it was is so that one person may not have an active executive power for more than eight years.
2007-12-18 06:23:23 · answer #3 · answered by Jarrison 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So lets see a complete revamp of how our congress works.... and doing it in less then a year with constitutional amendments while an opposing party runs congress
absolutely no.
Also Prime minister systems are more trouble then they are worth
2007-12-18 06:05:56 · answer #4 · answered by Larry B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Bush would want to be Prime Minister under Queen Hillary.
2007-12-18 06:33:00 · answer #5 · answered by TedEx 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. I'd rather it be Captian Crunch or the Cookie Monster.
2007-12-18 06:05:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why not? Bush has taken everything else of value away from us. Let him take that too.
2007-12-18 05:56:13 · answer #7 · answered by buffytou 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I assume this is a joke
2007-12-18 05:53:47 · answer #8 · answered by browndogzzz 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think Bill Clinton has his eye on that one.
2007-12-18 05:50:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Can we change that to 'Court Jester'?
'Buffoon'?
2007-12-18 06:00:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋