of Scientology, Christian Science, Mormonism, etc., but we have only a one-sided picture of Jesus. It doesn't seem fair, does it? (Noone should claim that Jesus had no faults since it is impossible to prove, and makes no sense anyway.)
2007-12-18 05:39:05 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
well we know he had a temper, when he threw the moneychangers out of the temple, and since they were jewish, it is also safe to assume he was a jew basher, anyway that is two faults to start with.
2007-12-18 08:03:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a Christian by birth and Jesus is our God. We believe in the teachings of Jesus Christ and not probing about his good and faults. However, I can tell you from your statement that you have already admitted that it is impossible to prove Jesus faults. Therefore, why a christian believer should bother to write down Jesus' faults? If his teachings are with full of faults, then how can we believe and accept Him as our God?
My advise to you that don't waste your time to find fault with others or their religious Teachers. In the world, there are number of Religions and their Gods. Why you have found fault with Jesus only, that too with your inability to prove the so called faults. I may further ask you whether you have the courage to make such allegations against the Gods of other religions. Please examine yourself and act accordingly, if you wish so.
Wish you worthy living.
2007-12-19 00:32:03 · answer #2 · answered by mollyvarg 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it fairly is an exciting question. in view that Jesus replaced into the two completely God and fully human, he could have had some faults, yet God has none. Jesus, like Mary, has continuously been without sin and that's the place the faults might lie. of course it does not "make experience"; this is the place faith is accessible in.
2016-11-03 23:14:26 · answer #3 · answered by crandall 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus is without sin, that's Kinda the point.
Jesus is the living God, because of of this he did not suffer from original sin and was able to live a pure life, and die for OUR sins.
If you can call it a fault when he was on the cross Jesus asked God why he had forsaken him, but it's not a sin.
The founders were great men, but they were men and have faults.
2007-12-18 05:46:41 · answer #4 · answered by MP US Army 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
"Does it bother you that noone bothered to write down Jesus' faults?"
Not in the least. One must realize that the books of the "New Testament" were written nearly 100 years after his death.
2007-12-18 05:49:14 · answer #5 · answered by Guessses, A.R.T. 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Actually there's a song about this:
"Every time I look at you I don't understand
Why You let the things You did get so out of hand
You'd have managed better if You'd had a plan
Why'd You choose such a backward time
In such a strange land?"
2007-12-18 05:44:50 · answer #6 · answered by stay_fan2 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
lol, problem was, he didn't have any faults. Without sin remember, no sin, no faults and that would make a very boring book and I doubt it would sell very well.
You say it is impossible to prove he didn't have any faults, but actually, it's just imposible to prove that he did, all the credibal writings about him say he didn't have any faults.
2007-12-18 05:56:42 · answer #7 · answered by Shalashaska 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Jesus is God, and therefore one would not expect to find faults.
That's the entire point of Christianity!
2007-12-18 05:55:50 · answer #8 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
first, Jesus founded no religion (Peter did), all he told us to follow his lead.
Second, humans are fallible and plagued with faults. As for Jesus, I'm unaware of any faults, please enlighten me.
2007-12-18 05:55:14 · answer #9 · answered by Alan S 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋