Stroking people, has Worked Reliably, In the Past.
2007-12-18 04:58:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I appreciate being told the truth like these two candidates are doing. We'll see if it works.
Vote John Edwards
2007-12-18 05:01:47 · answer #1 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Stroking? Terrorism seems to be working just fine. 'Realistic'? That's one of those words you use when you want to construct negative innuendo about your competitor as being unrealistic. Give me a positive future or give me death. Negative futures require no work to think up; any paranoid can do it.
The Will is positive, the Judgment is negative and brain power balances the two like magic, but do you want evil magic or peace.
2007-12-18 12:16:54 · answer #2 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And stroking people will continue to work in the future, and the best stroker will win, because Americans take too much for granted and don't do their civic duties as they should.
2007-12-18 05:02:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I don't think you could even compare those those 2 candidates. Edwards is an ambulance chaser - Paul is a doctor.
2007-12-18 05:02:17 · answer #4 · answered by Ida Slapter 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yes, too bad neither of those candidates are anywhere near realistic.
2007-12-18 05:04:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Edwards is one of those corrupt lawywers refrenced in an earlier question.
2007-12-18 05:02:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
edwards is the most unrealistic democratic candidate - in fact, it seems like he lives in a dream world
2007-12-18 05:01:25 · answer #7 · answered by PD 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Edwards is not an honest person.
2007-12-18 05:01:16 · answer #8 · answered by sweatyshavedpits 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yes, it does. That's why I wouldn't vote for either of them; they are not the examples of realism.
2007-12-18 05:02:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋