Gravitational collapse of a material body at absolute zero temperature might cause the creation of energy. Gravitational waves (still not yet measured) might be created. But charged and unchrged particles and electric and magnetic fields can be produced as a result of the collapse of a purely material body.
2007-12-18 04:34:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Your question is muddled. You ask how it was created. No one knows. You want scientific reasons such as gravitational energy and charges; both of those are types of energy in themselves. I'd ask you then what created gravitational energy? Was it a "negative charge?" Then what gave charge to the atom?
Matter and energy came out of the superparticle at the Big Bang. What caused the Bang? Where did the particle come from? What happened before that? We don't know although science is starting to lean toward a Creator in that regard. See Hawking or Einstein.
2007-12-18 04:15:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Judge and Jury 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Simple answer: no one knows.
Less simple answer: the question may not make sense. Energy may not have ever been "created" despite time have a beginning at the t=0 (or t=Planck time if you want to be precise).
One idea right now is that the Universe is basically a giant free lunch. It is a zero net energy spread out into pockets of positive (matter) and negative (gravitationally bent spacetime) energy vectors that sum to exactly (or exceedingly close to) zero. Using a quirk of Heisenberg Uncertainty we have found that particles/energy can "pop" into and out of existence for a period of time that is inversely proportional to the amount of energy that is "borrowed" from the vacuum. Now, if the total NET energy borrowed is basically zero, then it can be "borrowed" from nothingness/vacuum/whatever you want to call it (note our language fails us here) for an infinite amount of time. Ta-da the Universe.
Might not sound that satisfying, but that is what your question is obviously trying to get at. There are quite a few other ideas about "before" (in quotes because it is a meaningless concept in this regard) the Big Bang. Unfortunately, none will likely ever have strong evidentiary support.
BTW - the answerer above who says that Einstein and Hawking are pointing to a "Creator" has obviously not read much Einstein or Hawking.
2007-12-18 04:32:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joe 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
i'm no longer Atheist whether they are asserting that the enormous bang which replaced into an infinitely sizzling and tiny element in area exploded and multiple hydrogen got here out. The hydrogen replaced into as quickly as shaped into stars which then burned for a on an identical time as and so they exploded and launched star airborne dirt and dust which shaped into rocks and planets. Then on between the planets a pile of chemical ingredients touched and formed the common protein. extra were made and ultimately became a ordinary unmarried celled organism that divided and right now there have been a lot of them. They somewhat changed over the years they sometimes adapted to their environments and quickly a number of them began ingesting one yet another so they stepped forward over long classes of time and formed progressively extra complicated organisms. They lived in any different case and continued to conform and right now there have been many different organisms. Then a comet have been given right here hit the earth and wiped out the dinosaurs and the rats began to rule the international. The small mammal like creatures branched out in species over the years like the finished element else and the international have been given right here to be how this is. this is the problem-unfastened precis.
2016-11-03 23:03:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by hurlbut 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First when we talk about Energy , it must be defined. According to Dr.Richard Feynman ,a very famous Physisits,Stated " Scientists do not know exactly what is Energy ".
The Realm of theoretical Physics belongs to Men of science.
But the Realm of the Universe belongs to Our Creator.
As per Quantron theory of the Universe the Gravitational phenomenon and the Magnetic and Electrical phenomena are all one and the same description of the Power stored in the substance of Space in the containment volume of the Universe.
However, according to Einstein's Theory of General Relativity ,the Universe is a finite entity in a finite Containment Volume. That means that the Power and Energy in the Universe is conserved as well as the Time period of the Universe and its Mass content.
Energy in vector analysis is considered a scalar ;Hence a scalar is directionless having no positive or negative signs.
The Gravity Pressure in the Field of the Space Substance, holding the Earth into a one lumped Mass is defined per Quantron Theory as the product of the Mass of the Earth and the velocity of Light square divided by the volume of the Earth.
2007-12-18 04:46:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by goring 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Why should the energy be created? It exists and it can neither be created nor be destroyed.
Once you begin to think that it must be created you will end with the logical answer { not scientific] that it was crated by God..
Therfore, answer my question why should it be created?
While God can exist with out creation ,why can't energy.
Apart from religious theories, one can think that energy is God and it exits.
2007-12-19 00:20:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pearlsawme 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well basically energy wasn't really "created." (I know, argument over semantics) It is the transfer of electrons from one place to another. Let's say you have a carpet the contains electrons and you slide your feet across it. You are then collecting those electrons in your body. Then when you touch something containing less electrons your body will release them in the form of a little shock. Energy was just transferred, or created. The same goes in large scales with lightening bolts.
So I guess the answer to your question would be that it was first created when the first substance containing too many electrons came too close to another substance that needed some of them. They made a little exchange and behold...God said "let there be energy!" lol.
2007-12-18 04:12:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by safety 1st 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
The God answer to this question of where things come from is always the most annoying thing to me. Where did God come from then? Who created God? Does God have a God? What is the physics of God? Did God have to give up some of his energy to make ours? I don't think nameing a deity is the way to answer the question. It's ok to say we don't know.
2007-12-18 04:45:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by adam m 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Theres a reason everyone resorts to the "God" answer, even scientists. No one knows man, not even Yahoo! Answers... The reason? You can't just create something from nothing... the exact reason that you are going to be trying to explain the origin of the universe forever. And hey, who says that science isn't theory also? In this field of the origin of the universe, thats all there is...
2007-12-18 04:08:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
It might not have been "created" at all. You made the worst mistake one can make when asking a fundamental question: excluding the most fundamental and most likely answers while asking. Intellectually it is all downhill from there.
:-)
2007-12-18 05:22:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋