has the best ideas for dealing with the illegal immigration issue. This is issue is NOT limited to the Hispanic group, but all illegals in this country. It is really hard to tell from their mumbo jumbo where they stand and their ideas on fixing the problem.
Does anyone know?
2007-12-18 03:31:30 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Don't put all your eggs in one basket. This is true about whom to elect. It can't be on a single issue based.
2007-12-18 04:08:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree with the mentioned above. (jmatties)
Mitt Romney also is against having state intuition for illegal children. This will stop encouraging illegals to have children here because they will not get that money for school.
He is all across the board against ilegal immigration. Unlike ALOT of the other candidates that say they are against it but will support the kid getting a free ride which makes no sense. No illegal child should get a free ride out of pitty. There is no excuse for anyone being here illegally. They should be deported when found.
When Mitt Romney was Governor of Massachusetts he tried to make it possible for state troopers to deport illegals but it was over rided.
EDIT: mick- actually Mitt Romney has admitted he was wrong if you have been watching tv lately. Mitt Romney has NOT flip-flopped on illegal immigration issues. Stuff like abortion and gay marriage are not big issues. Lets focus on keeping illegals out and keep a stable economy. Actions speak louder.
Ron Paul may have all these great ideas but it's not up to him alone to make these decision. Based on action Mitt Romney has done a great job in the past. I don't see that Paul has done much.
2007-12-18 03:41:03 · answer #2 · answered by Let's go Red Sox! 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
This is a political football waiting to be kicked through the goal posts of life for a great many people on both sides of the issue. Yes, there is a lot of mumbo jumbo because people on all sides have strong opinions of this issue and it is not an easy issue to address.
2007-12-18 03:39:23 · answer #3 · answered by RT 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul, he offers a viable, realistic solution. It is unrealistic to think we can round up millions of people and deport them, but if people commit crime and are arrested they should be deported. If we take away the free social programs and the subsidies that encourage people to come here, they will stop showing up. If we stop taxing people to death and iomprove the economy to the point where people are no longer desperate to find a job they will no longer be so upset. We have always had immigrants in America and we should enable honest hard working people to come here, illegal immigration became a problem when we began taxing people in order to subsidies social programs that emcourage immigrants to come here illegally.
2007-12-18 04:12:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul is the only candidate who takes his stance on immigration seriously. Big Business supports illegal immigration, That's why we reward illegal immigrants with citizenship, and deny work visas to the untold millions who respect our laws and try to come here lawfully. Ron Paul is the only candiadte who wants to invite people to work here legally and stop rewarding illegals for their lack of respect. He's honest about everything else, so there is no reason to doubt him on his position.
Romney is a "flip-flopper", so none of his positions can be taken seriously. Paul never flip flops without admitting his past position was a mistake. When has Romney admitted he makes mistakes?
2007-12-18 03:48:01 · answer #5 · answered by mick t 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He grew to become right into a lukewarm candidate who have been given fortunate for the period of the primaries. the superb decision he made for the period of the full marketing campaign grew to become into choosing Sarah Palin, yet his execution grew to become into terrible. If he had performed his attitude good, he could have been waiting to proceed hobnobbing with dems and indeps whilst Sarah carried the backside, yet he screwed that up via going after Obama approximately invoice Ayers, a topic be counted reported months in the past, extremely of providing an perfect ingenious and prescient for how forward for united states of america of america.
2016-10-02 01:25:28 · answer #6 · answered by chappel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is true, Mitt Romney stands the toughest on illegal immigration, building the fence, deporting, punishing sanctuary cities for helping illegals, as well as taking away free programs for illegals. That is why at this juncture, he has my vote here in NH.
2007-12-18 03:51:21 · answer #7 · answered by Glenn T 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Tom Tancredo has the strongest views on illegal immigration than anyone else.
2007-12-18 03:34:45 · answer #8 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mitt Romney. Mitt supports finishing the fence and manning it with much more personnel and border patrol, but in addition he will make sure that all employers in this great nation cannot hire illegals lest they be faced with large sanctions. Mitt also plans on implementing a federal database, available to all employers, to check the validiy of a potential hire's documents to ensure they are legal residents. Governor Romney will cut the head of this snake off, killing it quickly in the process.
2007-12-18 03:35:34 · answer #9 · answered by jmattiesmufc 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Ron Paul. No amnesty, enforce the law.
2007-12-18 03:36:54 · answer #10 · answered by doug4jets 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋