Since that part of his anatomy would be inside of her? Would it therefore be "her body" such that she can legally castrate the man?
2007-12-18
02:14:21
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Gender Studies
Baba Yaga: How is that misandrist? Isn't it feminist? I'm just trying to understand the world through the feminist experience. Isn't that what you want? The pro-choice say that it's their choice because it's their body. But since the fetus is genetically distinct, that argument doesn't hold up against biological scrutiny, so they say that because the baby is inside them, it's their choice. I'm just using the same reasoning and applying it to other circumstances. It's only absurd because the reasoning behind feminism is absurd.
2007-12-18
02:33:59 ·
update #1
Swabbie: You mean that I've been doing it wrong?
2007-12-18
02:40:14 ·
update #2
Baba Yaga: I agree that it's BS. But that's just how feminist reasoning goes.
2007-12-18
03:19:52 ·
update #3