Since that part of his anatomy would be inside of her? Would it therefore be "her body" such that she can legally castrate the man?
2007-12-18 02:14:21 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
Baba Yaga: How is that misandrist? Isn't it feminist? I'm just trying to understand the world through the feminist experience. Isn't that what you want? The pro-choice say that it's their choice because it's their body. But since the fetus is genetically distinct, that argument doesn't hold up against biological scrutiny, so they say that because the baby is inside them, it's their choice. I'm just using the same reasoning and applying it to other circumstances. It's only absurd because the reasoning behind feminism is absurd.
2007-12-18 02:33:59 · update #1
Swabbie: You mean that I've been doing it wrong?
2007-12-18 02:40:14 · update #2
Baba Yaga: I agree that it's BS. But that's just how feminist reasoning goes.
2007-12-18 03:19:52 · update #3
I would have thought that any woman having sex with you might feel like trying it out.
2007-12-18 02:20:51 · answer #1 · answered by Ellesar 6 · 15⤊ 1⤋
Woman Castrates Man Video
2016-12-12 07:01:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the part of the male anatomy that is removed during castration is inside a female's body during sex, I would be more worried about THAT than what the woman would be doing with it whilst it is in there!! Take an anatomy lesson.
2007-12-18 02:37:29 · answer #3 · answered by jurydoc 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Muntajab this is for you... Why would a woman want or desire to posses a penis while it is inside her, don't you know that some women can't wait for the ''penis'' to be done, finish what it is doing and be outta there? anyway noone can legally castrate a man for selfish reason's just because she wants his piece inside her . I hear Bellvue calling, I think you should answer.
2007-12-18 03:14:33 · answer #4 · answered by TippaCowmoo 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No there is no legal foundation for her to do this. It's a silly argument.
2007-12-18 02:36:45 · answer #5 · answered by Jerry M 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
As long as it is removed at whatever point she requests it, then no... If it is NOT removed when she requests it, she has a legal right to use the minimum amount of force required to immediately effect its removal...
2007-12-18 02:23:53 · answer #6 · answered by halfthebottle 4 · 8⤊ 0⤋
How much time do you spend thinking up crap like this??
Might there be more productive things for you to do?
You have no reason to pull sh!t like this; yet if one of us posted equally misandrist nonsense, you'd be the first and the loudest to scream.
ETA: it's bullsh!t and you know it. I've been in cow barns that smelled better.
2007-12-18 02:28:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 13⤊ 3⤋
Not unless your part grew roots and attached itself inside her and feeds off her body to stay alive. Might happen with all the fertilizer spread around this forum so you might want to stay clear......
2007-12-18 02:38:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 1⤋
it's not dependant on the woman's body to survive & does not cause extreme & permanent bodily & life changes
how hard is that to understand?
sheesh
2007-12-18 03:07:46 · answer #9 · answered by Ember Halo 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Castration is removal of the testes. It is not removal of the penis. The testes are not inside of the woman. Your question is moot. And so are you.
2007-12-18 02:36:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 13⤊ 2⤋