Can anybody proof there is no God? Specially atheist.?

Question

U can proof it by scince, logic, philosophy etc.

To Guns & Broads, U tell me who told Mohammad(MPBUH) about these things1400 yaers ago and it will be enough for me.
1.“And the earth, moreover, hath He made egg shaped.”
[Al-Qur’an 79:30] (Which is proven 100 0r 150 years ago.)
2.“He has let free the two bodies
of flowing water, meeting together:
Between them is a Barrier
which they do not transgress.”
[Al-Qur’an 55:19-20] ("Modern
Science has discovered that in the places where two different seas meet, there is a barrier between them. This barrier divides the two seas so that each sea has its own temperature, salinity and density.", {"Principles of Oceanography, Davis, pp. 92-93."})
3.“It is He Who created the Night and the Day, and the sun and the moon:
All (the celestial bodies) swim along, each in its rounded course.”
[Al-Qur’an 21:33]

No body can proove there is no God. But it can be proved that there is One and Only.
u All can read the Book "The Quran and Modern Scince" and can find lots of proofs for existens of God as Quran was revealed 1400 years ago. Link for book is
http://www.irf.net/irf/drzakirnaik/dznindex.htm

Answer 1

Wonderful!! More mindless Islamist propaganda from somebody who wouldn't know a fact if it bit him on the nose.

If you believe in Alla, questions about the nature of Allah must enter your mind at some point. Is he corporeal? Who or what could possibly have created Allah? Can Allah simply have always existed, without a beginning?

The way I see it, neither Allah nor the physical universe could possibly materialize out of nothing. Conceding the possibility of Allah means one of three things:

1. Allah has always existed and is the creator of the universe
2. The physical universe has always existed but Allah is imaginary
3. Both Allah and the physical universe has always existed

As difficult as it is to imagine an eternal ANYTHING, imagining two of them is more difficult. We know and can prove the physical universe exists . . . but we don't know nor can we prove that Allah exists. Options 1 and 3 are more complex than option 2 because we would need to explain Allah as well as the physical universe -- we would have two mysteries instead of one. Injecting Allah into the question unnecessarily complicates it: particularly when there's no evidence for him in the first place. None of this explains where ANYTHING came from; that question is not answerable (yet).

There are no (absolute) proofs for, or against, the existence of Allah.

Proof is a tricky word. Many people think that proof establishes something is an absolute fact. That's not often the case; at least, not in the everyday world.

In jurisprudence and science, a reasonable basis for proof is based on solid evidence and the absence of any known contradiction. There's a "reasonable person" standard which defines proof as "beyond a reasonable doubt". The test of time fortifies proofs.

You say there are no unicorns? Prove it. You see? ABSOLUTE proof is an illusion -- especially when trying to prove a negative, such as "There is no Allah". It was once believed that all swans are white – nobody had ever claimed to see a swan that wasn’t white. The assertion that “There are no non-white swans” was believed to be true until black swans were discovered in Australia.

However, rephrasing the assertion from "There is no Allah", to "Allah is imaginary", makes proof easier, using the "reasonable person" standard. We can't ABSOLUTELY prove it but we can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Consider this . . .

No matter where man has spread, he as created countless gods. From aboriginal Australians to tribal Africans to American Indians to ancient Egyptians . . . they've all created gods prolifically and with ease. That man creates gods is a well-known, indisputable fact.

But what about the opposite? Allah creating man? We DON'T know that he did. We have no evidence that he did. We have no reason to think that he did. All the evidence points to evolution over the course of billions of years. There's growing evidence that life originated from abiogenesis -- from an electro-chemical reaction in the primordial soup of early Earth.

So, with countless thousands of gods to man's credit, believers are in the untenable position of asserting that all the gods that came before and after theirs are false . . . but their own god (and religion) is real and true. Asserting that one's own god is real, when we know that man created all the others, is ridiculous. It is so unlikely that we can safely consider it delusional.

Man has created countless thousands of gods and YOURS (if you believe) has NO evidence. That, my friend, qualifies Allah’s existence as dubious, at best, and faith in him as misguided and misplaced. Based upon the preponderance of evidence, the assertion that "Allah is imaginary" meets the reasonable person standard for proof and has withstood the test of time for thousands of years.

Answer 2

Absolutely!

(Your spelling is appalling, by the way)

What we define as "FACT" are things that we see, hear, taste, smell or can observe and apply the scientific method towards.

Anything that does not fulfill these requirements is the opposite of a fact - a myth, a rumor, an opinion...

God, in fact, cannot be seen, heard, smelled, tasted or observed by any methods..

Christians will say that order proves a God, but it does not, all it proves is that there things appear to work in a certain way. God is not necessary for anything that we know.

Christians will try to re-define terms such as taste, feel, see, etc, to intimate that indeed, we can "see" God - i.e. see with the eyes of the spirit... But this is unacceptable. There is no evidence for a God... We have evidence for everything that is actually known and within the realm of our existence - God does not qualify on any level.

Ergo, the proof that god does not exist is the same proof we have that the tooth fairy does not exist. This is indeed proof and it would be admissible in a court of law.

Answer 3

You may want to proof read the next time you ask something. Seriously why does this question get asked? Is it some sort of way to get one who's belief is starting to slip through the cracks and the only way to reinforce it is to ask people who don't believe for proof of no existence for a god or gods?.... Its not my job to disprove a thing since all the talk of being real is going to be quite hard to provide no matter the method of choice to try and provide truth. The more I hear of this great deity the more I question this suppose power of his.

You say no one can disprove god but you most certainly haven't proven god at all just using scriptures and its been said many times. Scriptures do not make proof need to come up with something that everyone can believe and not what you believe. Try again "holy" scriptures doesn't work for everyone as long as a person believes it to hold the "evidence" and "truth" to one's or a cult's made up mystical man then yeah he's real only to those that believe in him, her or it.

Answer 4

A negative is very hard to prove. Can you prove to me that Zeus does not exist?

However there is a point at which one has checked all evidence and argument for something and all you get is a great big ZERO. This then leads me to say - there is no proof.

Now - yes - I could be wrong. There might be a scrap of information that adds up to more than just propaganda - conspiracy - mythology - nonsense and i may have over looked it but hay - is it worth it in the end, I might end up finding that indeed the Greeks ARE right and Zeus is the lord of all.

Answer 5

To GUNS & BROADS - How about absolute proof that God does not exist?

To MEGAN - What a typical Athiest reply. Can't prove there is no God, so throw the question back at the asker so you don't have to.

To BUCKSKIN - An old man with a bear watching us from a cloud? Ignorance is bliss.

Answer 6

By Science : There is no proof of god existence, therefore there is no god.

By Logic : If you can proof to be there are no Greenish Pink Invisible Hornless Unicorn, I would be wrong. Logically, it is the person there claim positive of an object that should be showing the proof.

By Philosophy : If there is a god but it does not show you how to end your suffering, then you can safety say it is not there.

Answer 7

If anyone could, there would not be any theists - at least not any intelligent theists. I cannot prove there is no god as equally as you cannot prove there are no leprechauns. I don't try to either.

Even the atomic theory isn't proved, but I accept it as fact. All I would need to believe in a god is some valid reasoning and evidence. I, unlike most who believe in a god, don't accept personal feelings/experiences as evidence.

Answer 8

Ha, i just think its humorous that people truly and deeply believe theres an old man with a beard watching over us from a cloud. If you simply read the Bible, you can easily see that it is written by man, and that anything your God says is against someone else. If it was such a common thing for this God to speak to man, why doesn't it happen now? Where are the modern gospels telling us God wants to destroy the earth and start anew?

Answer 9

You can't prove a negative. The burden of proof is on you since you're the one making the outrageous claim that there's a superhero sky daddy ruling over the universe.

Answer 10

No. There's no proof there isn't a god, and there's no proof there is.

But, as in a court of law, the person making the claim that something DOES exist has the burden of proof.