The Argument from the Possibility of Proving the Antithesis is not technically an argument for God’s existence. What is the primary purpose of this argument?
2007-12-17 03:14:09 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
no one thus far who has honestly set out to prove Gods Non-existence...has ever came back from thier research with the Fact He doesnt !!!
cause in Fact they ALL...came back with the Truth to the knowledge Jesus was resurrected and He is GOD
2007-12-17 03:20:39 · answer #1 · answered by hghostinme 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the 'Possibility of Proving the Antithesis'
proves nothing and can not be an argument for an absolute statement.
knowing that there is a possibility that an antitheses ( of what ? ) might be proven, opens the possability of disproving the thesis.
whatever the argument is , it should contain words that express doubt like might / possability, maybe etc.
2007-12-17 03:20:40 · answer #2 · answered by gjmb1960 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋