English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

1611. Since you asked this question. What are the differences in those 4 times revised?

2007-12-17 01:32:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Only 4 times?I thought more, but that is not my field.
Neither version is inspired-certainly not the first one!. Its an excellent Bible translation for the time and the resources the translators had. The language is beautiful. It does contain the word of God. But it is not inspired.
And, anyone or group that worships the King James Bible is guilty of idolatry.

Most will conveniently forget that on the first revision the apocryphal books were removed.

2007-12-17 01:34:13 · answer #2 · answered by Poor Richard 5 · 0 0

The Bible itself is inspired. The translations are only protected from destruction.

There have been many attempts at destroying all record of the Bible or at least keeping it in a dead language so no one would be able to understand. Good for us they never entirely succeeded.

There are some errors in all translations, some more than others. Translating between different languages and centuries makes it impossible not to have some errors. Use several to make sure you get the sense of what the writer was trying to convey.

2007-12-17 01:39:42 · answer #3 · answered by grnlow 7 · 0 0

No, truthfully there replaced into yet another revision in 1979 referred to as the hot King James version (NKJV). in my view, i admire the previous unique KJV of 1611, yet I additionally use the living Bible and the Amplified Bible so as that i will get an entire information.

2016-11-03 13:46:12 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The revisions were not done in an effort to change the meaning or message, only to clarify it in accordance with the changes in language(s) down through the ages.

I see this as another excuse to try and discredit the bible.

2007-12-17 01:37:24 · answer #5 · answered by Servant Leader 5 · 0 0

The "revisions" were of spelling and grammar, not substance.

2007-12-17 01:31:14 · answer #6 · answered by twincrier 4 · 0 0

Makes you wonder how there can be so many versions of the truth doesn't it.

Love and blessings Don

2007-12-17 01:33:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

revised? i dont think so

2007-12-17 01:30:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

apparently all of them...although that makes no sense, that's what they are going to tell you...

2007-12-17 01:30:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers