Atheists: are all religious people harmful to society or just certain ones? If so, which ones?

Answer 1

Just certain ones - mainly the fundies who preach and proselytize at people who aren't interested, and try to force their beliefs onto others via the law (way too many of that kind, unfortunately). Also, the ones who actually obey the Biblical God (not many of those, fortunately).

Answer 2

The only ones harmful to society are the leaders and the ones that transition to public office or have control over children. Religious people in general aren't harmful, but the feed the fire.

Answer 3

All religions are harmful, in varying degrees. Obviously the fundamentalist ones are the most damaging to society.

Answer 4

Not all religions are harmful right now.

Every religion has the potential to be, however... even the atheistic ones... and every religion I can currently think of has been harmful at some point.

Answer 5

it fairly is much less ask your self than ask your self and problem. they are apprehensive individuals to three quantity: they see people who can function, and overall performance properly, without faith. Even the bare threat diminishes the importance of their ideals, with the aid of fact it potential that faith isn't truthfully had to stay. It opens the door to the gruesome threat that, possibly, faith is invalid. somewhat some religious human beings entertain the thought without faith, or, without the assumption in a god, life could be bleak, hopeless and desperate. while they are confronted with the actual incorrectness of this theory, they sense variety of robbed. in spite of each and every thing, faith, in spite of its advantages, does comprise a cost. You do resign an element of freedom. it would desire to be the form of freedom you do no longer want or perhaps want, yet human beings instinctively dislike any difficulty to their very own freedom of action. Atheists have not have been given any theoretical obstacles. None in any respect. purely sensible ones. properly, and those positioned upon us via billions of years of evolution interior the form of social instinct and precis intelligence. The scariest attractiveness for a non secular guy or woman while confronted with an atheist may well be, i think of, that there fairly isn't that a super number of a distinction. properly, in actuality, it variety of feels there's a distinction. Japan, this is purely approximately fullyyt functionally atheistic (maximum all of us is the two Shintoists or Buddhists, or the two, yet no longer fanatically so; approximately 2 in keeping with cent of the eastern are Christians, and, I think of, no longer fanatically so), has a plenty decrease crime value (approximately 4 to 5 circumstances decrease as regards violent crimes) than u.s., the place 3 quarters of the inhabitants claims to be Christian. even nonetheless the inhabitants density is plenty larger in Japan. One is pressured to end from this that the two the eastern all of us is innately plenty, plenty extra effective human beings than US voters, being far much less possibly to commit a criminal offense in spite of being atheists, or Christianity has no longer precisely made US voters extra regulation-abiding. this could be notably stunning to a believer. So, i've got faith they instinctively shrink far flung from atheists.

Answer 6

The ones that try to change their teachings into law. The ones that try to kill their children for being disobedeint. The ones that kill in the name of their gods, in general. The ones that pester you into converting. Those ones.

Answer 7

I believe in a deity = perfectly fine by me. Usually done for warm fuzzies or laziness.

I believe in a deity, therefore... = traumatizing to the individual and society. Often results in deaths, illogical laws, wars, etc.

Answer 8

Just the fundies who act out their religious beliefs on others.

Answer 9

The extremists, of course.

Answer 10

Yes. They vary between passively harmful to society and aggressively harmful.