Should recreational hunting be banned?

Answer 1

No, it shouldnt...

Answer 2

Hunting has been described to be a vital component of modern wildlife management. Simply, hunting helps preserve a population of healthy animals within the environment. It must be noted that the United States wildlife managers contribute to the regulating of hunting and the licensing of individuals to hunt legally. This is to set rules on the number, manner and condition of which game animals such as large mammals or migrating birds maybe selected for prey

Answer 3

I like the idea of having woods, fields, animals and birds. Banning hunting and still keeping those things would require an equal response to protect their habitat. Let's get rid of any population center that requires food to be trucked in, and then we'll talk. If you like cities, towns, roads, etc., then you're down to a choice of wildlife with hunting or no wildlife without hunting. There is NO option involving civilization+wildlife without hunting as part of the mix.

Answer 4

No it shouldn't be banned. In most states where hunting is very popular. The wild life being hunted out numbers the entire population of the state. Hunting does it's best from keeping animals such as deer from hitting people and causing injury or death while they drive. Also many states use animals such as deer to feed families who can't afford food.

Answer 5

No, but asking "should hunting be banned" questions should be banned from the hunting section. Enough already! I wonder if the rugby section has "should rugby be banned" questions, or if cooking section gets a lot of "should cooking be banned" questions.

Answer 6

The variety of hunters (animals hunters, it is) interior the U.S. is declining each and every 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. As as quickly as rich fishing areas are depleted of inventory, and individuals congregate in and fish out the relax areas, further and extra areas would be closed to fishing. because of the fact the human inhabitants will enhance and spreads itself over the globe, there will be much less and much less looking and fishing so there is not any desire for a ban on them. (i've got considered "actual" looking remote places: a guy retaining a knife in his mouth together with his the teeth and a couple of canines who would run down a deer, try against it to the floor and slit its throat. the guy had to artwork for his village's meat unlike lazy American hunters.)

Answer 7

This is kind of a stupid question for a hunting answer board don't you think?

Answer 8

If you mean all hunting then no, that is just stupid. If you mean hunting just to kill and leave an animal to spoil then yes.

Answer 9

Can you give me even one good, well thought out , and researched answer as to why it should be banned. I can give you more reasons to keep hunting than you can give for banning it.

Answer 10

Insurance companies wouldn't allow it. They are already pressuring states to increase hunting seasons and allow more deer to be harvested.

PLus, like John stated above, only if you also ban everything I don't like as well.

Answer 11

YES it should be banned and outlawed, but only when there are no longer any people who now participate in it, or when there is nothing left to Hunt.* I don't foresee that happening, but let me know if and when it does.*