English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If awesomeness is the critierion that necessitates a creator, then the creator must surely require a creator himself, in order to be awesome enough to create some awesomeness... yes? :-)

2007-12-16 10:34:15 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

You'd think so, wouldn't you. I say that if GOD doesn't require a creator, then neither does the universe. Any other metaphysical explanation for such a requirement is just blowing smoke up our collective asses.

2007-12-16 10:38:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

well, not really. That would actually be illogical. If God had a creator, he couldn't hold the title of God.

Anything created cannot be a god, by definition of the word.
For God to be God (and hold that title, reserved for the Creator) then he had to have always existed, and must be supreme in his power, having nothing in existence more powerful than He, (either created by, nor that has the power to destroy him) otherwise he cannot logically be God.

If He has a beginning and/or an end, He cannot be God.

So the answer is no. An "apparently awesome nature" may imply and require a Creator; but an "awesome God" does not require, imply, or need a Creator, as well, as i said, if God had a Creator, he could not logically, or possibly be "God."

2007-12-16 11:14:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

when you consider which you desire to place self assurance in a favorite technology "authority," I heard Sagan say as quickly as "The universe developed expertise with a view to verify itself," as though the universe became into in limitless entity, yet he did not say why or perhaps posit the question of why is it doing this, as a results of fact, such as you, he became into averting the risk of God. the subject isn't no remember if God exists and if He does then who created Him, and due to that logical fallacy, then why not the universe continuously present. the subject is why would and how did remember evolve existence. technology additionally believes the universe had a beginning up from the enormous bang, which you very surely surpassed over of your argument, so as that for the period of addition they could have self assurance, logically, that the universe could have an end. What you're doing is announcing that the perception in God is illogical to you and which you suspect in technology's narrow and illogical perception in Darwin. you've self assurance what you pick, even though it incredibly is purely that, a perception, no diverse than the perception in God. What you're actually not answering nevertheless is how and why is there area, remember and potential, and how could and why would senseless and purposeless remember evolve into dwelling varieties of guy or woman “beings” with self-wide-spread egos that they perceive with and then conflict to stay to tell the tale and procreate? existence and evolution of people could not have surpassed off by using random threat, even over a limiteless quantity of time, as a results of fact there's no reason for remember to try this, not except there's a dressmaker and a objective for it.

2016-10-11 10:28:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

God is spirit,,and has just always been and will always be. He didn't need a creator because he is, Alpha and Omega,,,the beginning and the end of everything. All things will end,,but God goes on forever and those blessed enough to find the truth in this lifetime. They too, will become ageless and eternal...

2007-12-16 10:47:48 · answer #4 · answered by dreamdress2 6 · 0 2

The latest idea is that the universe was created by two ( things ) colliding , Mr and Mrs God having a punch up ? Now that would be awesome .

2007-12-16 10:46:08 · answer #5 · answered by londonpeter2003 4 · 1 1

I have already established that "the talking banana who controls the universe" is the big Kahuna who existed before and outside of eternity and infinity and he was the one who invented alpha & omega and who created God.

2007-12-16 10:39:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes, I agree, even as a christian.
A few years back I read an interesting short story about God, and how he was just a child and this world is an experiment, and his 'elders' were actually grading him on his creation.
Makes you think dosen't it? LOL!!!!!

2007-12-16 13:11:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Is this a drinking question? It should be.

God is the creator of space and TIME. If you don't have time, you can't create God. Therefore, He really is as He said, uncreated creator.

A little logic can go a long way.

2007-12-16 10:41:58 · answer #8 · answered by Michelle C 4 · 0 4

God has always been. Always will be. We are on a time limit. So we think in time. We are born, and we will die. God created all things. Its a lot to take in that he Is, And will aways be. Sometimes we have to look beyond our mortal selves to know the greatness and vastness of creation in this world and beyond.

2007-12-16 10:41:58 · answer #9 · answered by nora d 4 · 2 3

In no way does "awesomeness" imply a creator.

2007-12-16 10:37:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

fedest.com, questions and answers