2007-12-16 09:00:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment ➔ Global Warming
No. On this issue he is not leading - He is reluctantly reacting and the US are dragging their feet at ever possible point.
2007-12-16 09:07:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
the oil spill had not something to do with why sadam grew to become into ousted. G.w comes from an oil history, has returned and returned subsidized oil drilling in reserves which throws up uranium into the ambience, and has not taken international warming heavily sufficient to enforce a plan to stop or shrink movements via important companies that are shown to be unfavorable to our environment. the respond is not any.
2016-10-01 23:07:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This question and answers given are a perfect illustration of the power of the media's control over peoples beliefs.
Answers given are based on what people have been 'told'.
Absolutely no desire to learn & understand.
It also illustrates how an 'opinion' forum is of little value to a truth seeker.
2007-12-16 10:09:01 · answer #3 · answered by Rick 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
. When President Bush refused to sign the Kyoto Accord he was well within his rights to protect American Industry and thus, our economy. China, India, and The Soviet Union expel more uncontrolled flue gasses than does American Industry.Yet there is little control within their borders to reduce their expulsion. American industry has invested millions of dollars in scrubbers, and systems to reduce emissions. The same cannot be said for the rest of the industrialized nations of the world. So . Mr. Gore go to the center of the problem which is not the United States.
2007-12-16 09:42:57 · answer #4 · answered by googie 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
LOL you make me laugh G.W could F*Ck up a wet dream environmentally friendly my butt the only thing that man is worried about is how fat his wallet is
2007-12-16 09:19:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
What's with this question? I know, you just want to read answers that will make you laugh.
2007-12-16 16:36:27 · answer #6 · answered by Shilo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this a trick question
if he was would they sanction this
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvF2yjbRkO62ppST9adEfdzsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20070618163201AAyuI69
the focus is on depopulation and global control ,not Global warming and the fate of the masses.
2007-12-16 09:12:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
No.
Although South America isn't much competition in that field, Canada is still much more friendly. But internationally the US does terribly this field.
2007-12-16 09:07:55 · answer #8 · answered by Jesus Cake 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not trying to be disparaging here but is this a serious question?
2007-12-16 09:12:30 · answer #9 · answered by damienabbey 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No doubt about it.
He is fighting the good fight against totalitarianism and oppression.
For example, look at the environment Saddam Husein created in Iraq for his people.
2007-12-16 09:08:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋