People say that gay people have sex with their own gender because they love the other person.
Well, I love plenty of people without having sex with them.
What's the deal?
2007-12-16 07:01:18 · 48 answers · asked by Dysthymia 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
gay people dont have sex because they love - they have sex for the same reasons that everyone else does - cause it FEELS good
2007-12-16 07:03:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Sex is great! And I had as much of it as I could get, before I got married. And there is nothing wrong with that. I was an adult.
People who are in with love each other, are entitled to have sex.
And it does not matter if they are same gender or opposite. If they are two consenting adults, they can have sex.
Relative don't want to have sex, unless they are sick and twisted.
Child molesters, are selfish individuals who care only for themselves, and pedophiles are perverted anyway, because they need to have sex with children.
Religious people can not stand the fact that sex is a natural and normal function, between two people who care, or love each other.
If you have a problem with sex? Don't have any!!
2007-12-16 09:31:58 · answer #2 · answered by moonbaby 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can love a person and still not have sex with that person, Gay people in a relationship, have made their own choice as to what they want to do in that relationship! If they don't want to have sex in their relationship, why then do they choose someone of the same sex for a partner?
2007-12-16 07:09:50 · answer #3 · answered by Gerry 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm willing to bet many have had sex without love ever entering the picture as well.
You don't have to have sex with those you love. If so, wouldn't that mean you'd have to have sex with family? That's just a bit wrong.
Love and sex as a combination are the best, IMO - but I don't plan and have never planned to have sex with everyone I love.
It's assuming that all types of love are the same - and we know better than that.
2007-12-16 07:09:18 · answer #4 · answered by Cheese Fairy - Mummified 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In the Bible there are four words used in place of the translated word "love" Eros is sexual; Philia is friendship that requires time and this can happen within genders; Storge is physical affection and can also be between "just friends" and the widely touted Agape which is unconditional love which is the love that John 3:16 refers to that cannot be earned.
2007-12-16 07:06:07 · answer #5 · answered by Pi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a vast difference between love and sex. Sex is an animal instinct. A person who "needs" sex doesn't care where they get it, as long as they get it, and it feels good.
Love, on the other hand, is indiscribably wonderful, though sometimes, because you worry about the other person, it can get sad or painful.
2007-12-16 07:06:30 · answer #6 · answered by ralahinn1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love and sex don't have to go together. Nor do all people have sex w/ everybody they love.That would require an aweful lot of sex! Anyway, have sex w/ your mate. Leave the rest of the world alone. That's what the Lord intended.
2007-12-16 07:11:15 · answer #7 · answered by paula r 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, love does not mean intercourse. Do too a lot of human beings mistake the two? You betcha. intercourse could inhance love, yet love isn't had to have intercourse. intercourse is largely a phyical connection between 2 human beings. human beings motel to intercourse as a results of fact in our sense-good international, we are searching for instantaneous gratification. we are so related to our technological "issues" that we've hassle making human touch without resorting to creating it sexual. the final relationships, those that are truly sturdy, are those that start up out with friendship. they're in line with 2 human beings having the comparable values and making the different's needs as significant as their very own. intercourse is in basic terms the sauce. it is not the substance. in case you're able to have intercourse to make a dating finished, then it is not the authentic ingredient. as a results of fact sometime some thing ought to take place to one in all you and you mustn't have the potential to have a sexual dating. What you're able to have on the middle of your dating is intimacy. With that, you're able to have a loving, giving, sharing, relaxing dating. Will you omit the intercourse? you should omit what substitute into, yet you like the guy adequate so as which you're able to extremely have them without intercourse than everyone else with it. That pronounced, a sexual dating can basically strengthen love. It can provide that feeling which you extremely don't comprehend the place one in all you ends and the different starts off. it is cosmic. it is like being bathed in heat water, surrounded through gentle. And what i'm describing isn't actual. intercourse without love is in basic terms actual. intercourse with love is non secular. it is a mixing of heart, techniques, soul and physique. in case you don't comprehend what I mean, you have not skilled it.
2016-12-11 06:46:20 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe it's the difference between loving someone, and being in love with someone.
No, you don't need sex to love someone. It's just that people gain satisfaction out of the physical aspect of the relationship.
2007-12-16 07:06:06 · answer #9 · answered by xKYLEx 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well you don't have to have sex when you love someone. And anyways, if people say that, they are probably talking about romantic love. Not the kind of love you have for your family and friends.
2007-12-16 07:05:30 · answer #10 · answered by dazedandconfused 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh, boy. That's disgusting. Yeah, no deal. :)
Love is love. Sex completes it if ever possible. Sex is also animalistic. So two different things.
There are couples who've been in love for ages but never had sex or haven't had it for years.
2007-12-16 07:58:17 · answer #11 · answered by HeavenYoura 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋