English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

another issue to take the focus off Iraq?

2007-12-16 05:18:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

George Bush is a lame duck president. He is running for nothing and really doesn't need a new agenda to replace the Iran Nuclear weapon threat.

I don't really know what to believe regarding Iran and it's desire to produce a nuclear weapon. If what Ahmadinejad says is true, that he only wants nuclear energy as an alternative power source, when he is living in the middle of a sea of oil, then this is hard to believe.

The US and UN are wise to watch Iran ever so intently regarding it's effort to produce nuclear energy. It should treat this scenario as a rogue country gone berserk, because if it does come up with even one bomb, Iran will be history. Just ask the Israeli's !

2007-12-16 06:12:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He won't have to do so, because they never stopped their program.
The Democraps are trying furiously to keep the country from seeing that they have owned the Congress for 13 months and done nothing.
And, by God, it's working.

2007-12-16 05:31:34 · answer #2 · answered by Jeff L 3 · 0 0

I guess you didn't hear, that only confirms his thought that Tehran is trying to develop nuclear weapons. So, no. It is still an issue in his mind.

2007-12-16 05:23:43 · answer #3 · answered by apple juice 6 · 1 0

The at present disclosed CIA intelligence rewards Iran for combating their gorilla conflict against the yank occupation of Iraq, and cools the point of the chilly conflict between Iran and the U. S.. an analogous intelligence became into withheld in 2003 to create conflict hysteria against Iran, with a view to make attainable a militia attack against them and to intimidate Iran by using making them have self assurance we'd attack them. Barring such an attack, Bush II can attempt to stress Iran into backing off of Iraq. The CIA releases the intelligence that might help the plans of Bush II. it incredibly is not an open democratic corporation. For conflict against Saddam in Iraq it lied with claims of WMD. For the tried attack against Iran (which now could be on carry) it lied on the subject of the state of Iranian weapons progression. Bush i became into head of the CIA, and on an analogous time as he became into there crafted a plan for militia domination of the region, construction underground bunkers interior the barren region of Saudi Arabia that we nevertheless occupy. while he became President, Bush i began out to have interplay his plan by using goading Saddam to attack Kuwait by using telling him by diplomatic “lower back channels” the U. S. does not merchandise if he would take over Kuwait (an historic province of Iraq). as quickly as Saddam invaded of direction, Bush I unleashed conflict plans that allowed the U. S. to proceed to be interior the region with militia forces. As a democracy we can't have faith the CIA to offer us uncomplicated information. The elite view in government is that public opinion in a democracy must be controlled and manipulated. concern of WMD seems to be their favored technique. in certainty, Iran is springing up WMD. One could question, although, how lots of this could be a self-relaxing technique as a results of fact of Iran attempting to guard itself against the bullying of the Bush dynasty.

2016-10-11 10:00:06 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You will need to convince Europe, the are not so convinced by the Intel that was just released. Why do people think that we are in this alone? It's a very stupid and dangerous assumption.

2007-12-16 05:22:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

No, but it won't stop him from either making up another distraction or claim that the report s wrong. I think this latest CIA tape-gate should keep him occupied though.

2007-12-16 05:38:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

He is preparing to invade Canada. This will boost ratings.

2007-12-16 07:17:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Political question so post it over there troll.

2007-12-16 05:58:08 · answer #8 · answered by conranger1 7 · 0 0

oh that wont be hard. he'll just say they are harboring terrorists and have WMD's then we will be right to war with them too. seemed to work with Iraq

2007-12-16 05:29:29 · answer #9 · answered by Dont get Infected 7 · 0 2

He's still looking for the WMD's.

2007-12-16 05:21:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers