Why shouldn't he be?
It's a free country.
Apart from that, if you read his books, you will see that one of the points he is making is that the "easy-going" religious people make the environment in which the extremists can flourish, because they place religion in the "untouchable" category of public discussion.
2007-12-15 14:31:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kevin M 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I wonder that, too, considering the God he decries seems to be the more-or-less exclusive deity of evangelical Americans. I can't see anything in Anglicanism to engender the vitriol he has. Then again he could just be looking at the effects of American policies on the world stage, especially in the last few years.
Peace to you.
2007-12-15 14:36:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Orpheus Rising 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know some individual Episcopalians that if they were the only ones you knew, then you'd have a poor view of the church. However, whatever these people were associated with just because they're toxic people would give you a "bad taste". He might have had some bad experiences.
2007-12-15 16:34:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Purdey EP 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They might be easy going, but they are still wrong.
2007-12-15 14:50:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the world is filled with hypocrites, like, say, Richard Dawkins?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjgAn4GeT3n3TNs.gtOOzfYAAAAA;_ylv=3?qid=20071215115151AALga4c
That's my hubby there, give him some love.
2007-12-15 14:31:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Last Ent Wife (RCIA) 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because, he has come to know his fate and it ain't very pretty
2007-12-15 15:09:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by MariaAntonietta 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he's opposed to the irrationality of religion more so than to what it it's demeanor is and how well it behaves.
http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb62/Randall_Fleck/Chapman_Cohen.jpg
[][][] r u randy [][][]
.
2007-12-15 23:33:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋