The extensive evidence for each can be evaluated independently. If you set your threshold very, very, very high, you can find that either does not meet your criteria. Setting ludicrously high criteria, without a solid scientific framework is simply pigheadedness.
2007-12-15 05:10:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
i accept both. i have seen those who believe in the big bang theory and reject evolution, mainly cause they are religious and just put big bang beside god going "click, let there be life"
but i know of no one who accepts evolution and rejects the big bang.
each person has there own logic but too many of them have the wrong sense of logic.
with my logic, its not logical to accept one with out the other.
2007-12-15 13:18:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wes: i dont give thumbs down 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Big Bang and the ToE are two separate, independent theories. One could recognize one without the other.
The reason why they seem to go hand in hand is that the evidence for both of them is considerable.
2007-12-15 13:04:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No,and it does not strike me as logical to accept the Big Bang and dismiss God
2007-12-15 14:20:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by James O 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you consider circumstantial evidence more than enough to fill several rooms, and that is saving them electronically, then sure it's circumstantial.
But why not choose honesty? Why not stop lying about science?
2007-12-15 13:34:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by meissen97 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The answer to answer all questions is : blank.
What does that mean?...it means ..nothing.
We are beings of nothing; our world is made of nothing...we are nothing....we are the Bible....the Bible is a blank book...page after page of inconclusive nothingness....our future is like our past...forever empty.....
My gift to all of you is death. Logical suicide.
This existence is a lie. Lie after lie. This is Satan’s world. The father of all lies. There is no existence in this world. Nothing here is of God. We can live here or join God in death.
2007-12-15 13:01:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Adversity 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
They're both descriptive. Why would you reject either, except on the basis of their accuracy, unless they ruffle your faith-based fetlocks?
2007-12-15 13:02:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hera Sent Me 6
·
0⤊
1⤋