Or would that remove the element of surprise?
2007-12-14 23:27:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Finland takes part in quite a few UN missions, have served alongside Finns in both Bosnia/Croatia and in the Leb. I think they prefer to stay out of NATO its a decision which remains from the cold war
2007-12-14 23:57:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I as a Finn think that we shouldn't join NATO. Staying neutral is always the better choice.
And I don't think there will be another war / cold war, so it would be a waste of funds.
2007-12-15 00:00:19 · answer #2 · answered by punapetteri 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Stay the hell away from NATO.
Finland actually has a pretty strong army as it is and can defend itself, it doesn't need some random orginazation telling it what to do. NATO= Bad, Neutral = good.
2007-12-15 00:08:32 · answer #3 · answered by Dan. 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Finland should not join NATO.....
Becoz, after that Finland should be in control of the "big Boss"
2007-12-14 23:43:41 · answer #4 · answered by Its Anil 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Its Finland's decision, and what surprise???
Maybe such a decision would p i s s off Putin.
2007-12-14 23:45:22 · answer #5 · answered by conranger1 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Heck yes - they should join with the good guys. That should help with Russia threatening them
2007-12-15 00:47:14 · answer #6 · answered by Constitutional Watchdog 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
IF THEY WANT TO THEY SHOULD.
2007-12-15 06:33:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋