A person killed the another than the family is helpless of the deceased. But if the killer has get imprisoned than the another family is helpless than is it right to give imprisonment to a killer or some another way should be choosen for his punishment
2007-12-14 23:09:45 · 7 answers · asked by loving_human 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Etiquette
the starting of the question may be read as "Is" instead of "The"
2007-12-14 23:11:43 · update #1
Which country is imposing the law here? I am from the USA, and a man does not necessarily get killed for killing here. But pull that stunt in Greece or Saudi Arabia and I bet that's different.
2007-12-14 23:18:52 · answer #1 · answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you break the law in any way, shape, or form, you need to be accountable for your actions. If you take a life, then by all means, you should be put away for the rest of your natural life.
2007-12-14 23:17:22 · answer #2 · answered by pitbull1969 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer the idea of locking murderers in a sensory deprivation chamber for the rest of their natural lives, it would prevent them from being able to do or sense anything except to contemplate their crime.
2007-12-15 00:37:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends entirely on the circumstances (which are not clearly presented here.) I one is protecting their home from invasion of another and a death results, then there shouldn't be any consequences whatsoever.
2007-12-15 01:49:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no better alternative than imprisonment for a murderer.
2007-12-15 00:47:20 · answer #5 · answered by _I_love_warm_bananas_ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we had immediate execution after conviction, then No, we wouldn't have to give him imprisonment.
2007-12-14 23:19:18 · answer #6 · answered by Archery Nut 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i say send em to max for life with a big guy for a cell mate who will rape them for life
2007-12-14 23:13:43 · answer #7 · answered by Wes: i dont give thumbs down 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋