Some of those scientists have wives, and shouldn't be dating carbon on the side.
2007-12-14 13:25:02 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
AYE DIOS MIO -- if the carbon is not cabron -- no problemo.
2007-12-14 15:13:04 · answer #1 · answered by Cinthia Round house kicking VT 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
funny.
I have a problem with carbon dating being highly inaccurate in some cases, which brings the whole of it into question.
In 1980 some oil rigs were constructed in the gulf of Mexico. Carbon dating of the barncles that started to grow on the side of it, says the structure is over 50 million years old.
2007-12-14 13:29:59 · answer #2 · answered by flamespeak 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If the carbon is part of a still living organism. . .
Hey, has it every occured to you, you have too much time on your hands?
2007-12-14 13:36:03 · answer #3 · answered by Truth 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The definition of Science: Mans discovery of bits and pieces of what God created long ago.
I believe that carbon dating is good science.
The bible tells us that God created the animals before He created man. There is no specific time period mentioned.
So whats the problem?
2007-12-14 13:29:23 · answer #4 · answered by John W 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey that's funny,but carbon dating isn't accurate with out direct sunlight and for thousands of years before the Flood ,there was no direct sunlight.
2007-12-14 13:30:07 · answer #5 · answered by AngelsFan 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I have always preferred carbon courtship.
2007-12-14 13:30:58 · answer #6 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋