ex Italian president goes public and says 9/11 was a inside job almost two weeks ago, should there be ........

Question

.....a investigation into the information he has on his aligations?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=ITALY%27S+PRESIDENT+SAYS+9/11+WAS+A+INSIDE+JOB&spell=1

what about all the CIA officials saying the same thing?

mac, im not a italian, im an american, and what about all the CIA officials saying the same thing?

so we just dont even look at the information?

what about CIA and marine intel officer robert steele who says it was a inside job?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=robert+steele+9%2F11&btnG=Search

what about 29 year CIA field commander Robert baer who says the same thing?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=robert+baer+911+inside+job

what about 28 year senior CIA official bill christison that says 9/11 was a inside job?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bill+christison+911+inside+job&btnG=Search

john Q, engineers on 9/11

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=engineers+on+9%2F11

gunny, we never had a real investigation of 9/11, anyone who says we did knows nothing about the 9/11 comission report and how it was conducted. we never got a explaination for building 7 either

john Q, further, most of the sources you mention are government agencies, guilty investigating the guilty?? nist? fema? as corrupt as they get

Answer 1

Since he's not an engineer, we can safely assume his opinion is irrelevant.

Also, I don't even know if he said that, since there is no credible source for this claim. Most likely, it's simply not true or out-of-context.

In any event, why would you discard what all the published engineers & experts in demolition are saying in favor of a politician from Italy?

Every single expert (in demolition & engineering), on the face of the earth, who has published a journal article on 9/11, has rejected the conspiracy "science."

You can't find a single engineer who has published an article, in a real journal, in favor of the conspiracy.

This is a powerful fact that effectively puts an end to the conspiracy tales.

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

--NIST (National Institute on Science and Technology):
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Also see the lead investigator of NIST explain the collapse at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
Click on "Impact to Collapse"

-- The leading demolition journal in the world is against the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

--Professor Bazant (Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering) is one of only 14 people to win the Prager Award in engineering. He first described the collapse mechanism as follows: http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

--FEMA along with American Society of Civil Engineers, did an extensive analysis of the WTC collapse (ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study (BPS) Team)
http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article citing 300 renowned experts in demolition & engineering.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000
===================
The “American Society of Civil Engineers" is not a governmental agency. They represent thousands of independent engineers in the USA.

Neither is Scientific American, Purdue, MIT, Columbia University, Northwestern University, & many more not mentioned. In fact, every agency listed above is non-governmental except for two: NIST & FEMA.

I don't know of any proof or credible source that NIST & FEMA are "corrupt as they get."

Moreover, there's really no way to get all the scientists at NIST to lie. People just don't work like robots, all keeping quiet. Someone would have to squeel if it was a conspiracy.

However, no one has squeeled. Not a single, solitary person. How unbelievably strange. Must be there is no conspiracy
=================
While there are dozens of peer-reviewed scientific articles published supporting the official explanation 9/11, there isn't a single, solitary article on the face of the earth going against the official explanation.

All the engineers supposedly in favor of the conspiracy haven't published a thing in the scientific literature. That pretty much says it all.

Answer 2

I beleave it was an insied job.............no elegeals.......
This is what you get for answers with this question.
How much evidence do you need to think that maybe some of these people are whacko jobs?
Now, I don't believe everything the government tells me, either. But I am a former military person, and even though I was medically discharged against my will, I do believe it when the military shows me it was not done by our own.
Still don't accept it? Look at the Pentagon tapes that show the plane crashing into the building. Listen to the terrorists talking before they crash into the World Trade Center.

Answer 3

He is more more an engineering genius then the thousands of engineers who have said it was not an inside job. Name the CIA officials and have them got to the press with evidence of something rather then I think or I suspect/ This is really getting tiring. No I don't believe and any one who had an open mind to start with and looked at all the evidence would not either. If you are that sure of this theory-Get your rends together and sign a legal document that if it is investigated and dos not agree with your "inside job" conspiracy you will reimburse the government the total cost of the investigation. Better yet go to a credible investigative service and pay them to research it and see what they find or say. Just give it a rest on talking and either get concrete evidence or quit the accusations.

Answer 4

He went PUBLIC? And there's been NOTHING in the news about it?
HAHAHAHAHOHOHOH Basta cosi! Stai lontano di mia moglie prima ti che rompe gli palle!

Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.

Can you say GULLIBLE?
THANKS for the BIG guffaw!

Answer 5

Yeah like HE would know anything and stop all these s h i t links to stupid blogs, they prove ZERO about 9/11.

Answer 6

No, because we all know its a conspiricy theory (which are rarely plausible) and Congress wastes enough money and time as it is. Why would we investigate something that we know is implausible.

Answer 7

wake up americans before its to late,john q ...so if are president says anything we should ignore him cause hes not a expert on nothing.wake up,you dont think the PRESIDENT of italy has better info than F***king you.stupid yank,bush LOVES people like you,.....ps your not on the payroll right now are you

Answer 8

GOD! Dude, let it go. Is this all you do with your life? Go around & post BS questions about stuff that didnt happen. Sell your computer use the money to go to vocational school & move on with your pathetic life.

Answer 9

You have got to be kidding me?? The "Italian Job"?? You guys get more whacked by the day!! What are you guys smoking?? Seriously??

Answer 10

Their could never be enough evidence to convince some people. Whatever your source is it is never good enough. If it it mentioned on the news,it is quickly followed by all sorts of insults. "Wacko,tinfoil hat baaaabaaa,whoever thinks this should be hung for treason. baaaaaaaabaaaaaaaaa". Whoever or whatever it is,is not credible.Baaaa.