English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Can a criminal case that's been reported and later dropped be used during trial by the DA against the defendant? Even though it was previously dropped way before the court trial? BTW, this is in California.

2007-12-14 08:58:52 · 7 answers · asked by Northstar 1 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

7 answers

The only convictions which can be introduced to impeach the testimony of a witness are felony convictions. However, proof of any relevant CONDUCT can be introduced during a trial, whether or not that conduct resulted in a felony conviction--in fact, whether or not that conduct constituted a crime. The question is the relevance of the conduct. A jury will have to decide first whether the alleged conduct took place. If they do, it may be relevant on one of several grounds: impeachment, to show the defendant (or other witness) acted in accordance with habit or custom, to show that the person acted with the same intent on a prior occasion as is now alleged, etc., etc.

2007-12-14 11:59:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Criminal Record Search Database : http://www.SearchVerifyInfos.com/Support

2015-10-22 15:45:43 · answer #2 · answered by Ezra 1 · 0 0

It depends if you the accuser decides to testify on your behave. The DA can trick you to answer a in direct question with respect to your prior dismissed case. If you answer the DA's question you leave the door open for him to come at you with the direct question which he would use as an example when you answer it with a yes.

He can't use it against you if you don't testify. Because it can back fire on him.

2007-12-14 10:05:58 · answer #3 · answered by John 5 · 0 1

Criminal Record Search Database - http://tinyurl.com/C3SyLCioSG

2015-09-27 19:14:06 · answer #4 · answered by Luis 1 · 0 0

If memory serves me correctly....priors can be used during the sentencing phase of a trial.

Maybe one of my brethren from California can provide a better response!

2007-12-14 09:01:48 · answer #5 · answered by KC V ™ 7 · 1 0

Seems to me they can't use that as evidence against a person, unless they've been convicted of the previous offense.

2007-12-14 11:00:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ask OJ

2007-12-14 09:02:18 · answer #7 · answered by G-gal 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers