Well lets put it this way.
The F-15 is 103 -0 in air to air combat.
The Su-27 is 0-0/
Now which would you want to be in ?
The proven air plane, or the russian made air plane .
F-15's have shot down :
Mig 21 - 38
Mig 23 - 25
Mig 25 - 4
Mig 29 - 9
SU-7 - 1
SU 22 - 4
SU 25 - 2
Mirage F1 - 8
F4E - 2
When will people learn, russian military equipment suxs
2007-12-14 14:30:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
3⤊
7⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
which fighter would win in a all out dogfight.. f15 eagle vs su 27 Flanker?
if both pilots had the some live of training and its one on one who would win eagle or Flanker..
2015-08-16 08:19:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The SU-27 Flanker has better maneuverability and high alpha performance. The F-15 has slightly better speed but this is of little use in a dogfight. If the pilots have equal skill, in a no advantage dogfight (from the merge) the SU-27 would paste the F-15.
It was designed AFTER the F-15 specifically to BEAT the F-15. It was not designed as a ground attack aircraft (although, like the F-15, it has ground attack capability). You people are thinking of the MIG-27 or the SU-25 which are ground attack aircraft.
2007-12-14 08:10:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
F-15
2013-11-19 05:42:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joe 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
They are of similar design, however the F-15 has a superior avionics system, and was designed for air superiority, while the SU-27 was not. Of course, American pilots are, by far, the most highly trained combat pilots in the world, bar none. So this is kind of a moot point.
I love how mathan just listed off the armaments of the SU-27, yet has zero clue what any of them are for, or how well they perform. Well done, son.
2007-12-14 08:01:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
As most F-15's keep getting grounded, because bits keep dropping off them (the airframes are all 20 years old) I'd go for the Su-27, only because it can actually fly....
Roll on F-22, all 183 of them, thats 183 assuming no further cost cutting...hmmm..I wonder if the F-35 is going to be good enough...
2007-12-14 07:57:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Andrew W 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
As pointed out above the F-15 was designed primarily as a fighter, the ground support was added later on as a role with modifications making it the Strike Eagle, while the SU-27 is a ground attack aircraft capable of defending itself so the F-15 would win. It is performing the mission it was designed for. Rephrase the question to which is a better ground support aircraft and I would go with the SU-27 for the same reason-that is it's primary role and role it was designed for.
2007-12-14 08:01:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by GunnyC 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
The F15 Eagle will win hands down in a dogfight,
because the American Fighter Pilots are better trained and better disciplined!!
2007-12-14 08:22:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
The Eagle was designed to sweep the skies clean of enemy fighters and the Eagle can also operate as a fighter/bomber.
So a lot of times in modern aerial combat it is the very high tech of the weapons system which makes for victory in a dog fight.
2007-12-14 07:53:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
you do live by your name, if you want facts.....a few years ago american and inidan airforce did a joint military excersice together, the sukhoi's out perofmed the f-16, f-18 by miles, even the air force commander of the u.s air force said this is a wake up call for them...........and whats all this B.S about tihs raptor and f-35, these are not even in full production yey they are only prototypes and the su-27 was doing cobra and thrust vestoring manuvers in 1997 the raptors only or any u.s jet are only doing them now. and get your facts right, su-27 is a flanker, an interceptor not a ground attack aircraft.wot a bunch of uninformed wallies
2007-12-14 08:13:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋