Why is the idea of a very simple molecule that makes copies of itself so hard to imagine?

Answer 1

I think too many people make the jump from thinking that things went from no life, to rather complex life in a single jump. That is hard to imagine but it is not where the science leads us:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-simpler-origin-for-life

Answer 2

Well, I could ask why you think that Christians do not believe in Science. I believe in Science! But I also believe in God. If you notice; nobody can truly explain how the universe came to be! Nobody has an answer for that. They say the Big Bang, well ok; what happened before the Big Bang? Where did all the elements come from? The only possible way this universe came to be is if it was spoke into existance! And thats exactly how the Bible says that it began. Nobody can show evidence that God exists. Well I don't need evidence. As far as evidence is concerned, there is also no evidence that God does not exist! So that kinda backfires on the whole evidence deal. This is about faith; not evidence.

Answer 3

Well why would it make copies of itself? How does it know how to make copies? How would the "copy making" mechanism (which doesn't seem all that "very simple") come to exist?

Ms. Toaster - the Genetic code is like a computer program only written in molecules. Chemicals placed in a certain order spell out instructions for the cells to carry out - they define proteins to synthesize and even tell the cell what to do with those proteins. It is machines building other machines.. this is completely different from a crystaline pattern repeating over and over again...

You could look at the 1's and 0's of a computer's basic instructions and come to the conclusion that it's so simple just an "on" and an "off" - and the 1's and 0's just happened to arrange themself in such a pattern as to run your Windows OS and connect you to the internet but that would be foolish - there was a designer who made the code on your computer behave the way that it does just like there was a designer who made DNA.

Answer 4

right this is a synopsis of the present concept on beginning of existence (abiogenesis isn't a clinical concept -in basic terms a hypothesis for over a hundred years) learn by making use of Dr. Roger White of MIT. (a million) There are a great variety of techniques as to how existence ought to first have emerged. (2) there is enormously much commonplace contract that existence did no longer first turn up purely by making use of accident. (3) The conviction that existence did no longer upward thrust up frequently by making use of accident is dealt with as epistemically previous to the form of selection theories. (4) The suggestion that the beginning of existence must be because of any style of useful agency isn't considered as a severe selection, and would not play any specific place in theorizing. Dr. White is stating the logical fallacy of removing an smart agent in beginning of existence learn, because of the fact that threat is ruled out, and because there is not any different clarification as yet. i'd desire to renowned how DNA could make judgements too, because of the fact it has no intelligence of its very own. i believe an smart dressmaker programmed the DNA, and that i do no longer see the way it could have programmed itself. DNA is almost a working laptop or pc software, and intelligence is needed. Why is technological know-how so afraid to confess that possibly interior the finished universe, that must be an more desirable Intelligence? is likewise a hyperlink for yet another peer reviewed paper entitled "The RNA international hypothesis: the worst concept of the early evolution of existence (apart from each and every of the others)" And for an smart layout perspective, study the article "the suitable 5 problems for beginning of existence Theories" linked under. There are particularly great hindrances to beginning of existence scientists, and a few believe we can't in any respect understand the genuine beginning of existence. if so, how do they realize it did no longer ensue by making use of smart layout? regrettably, purely asking this question brings ridicule.

Answer 5

This question baffles me and reminds me that in 1987, while toking with husband, I discovered a loop in the molecular theory. Fat lot of good it did me. I didn't write it down, and by the next day I had forgotten it. Too bad for the world. Could have been something tremendous.

Answer 6

Heck, there are even some types of crystals that do the same thing.

Look at what I just typed, Morganie. All it takes is ripping apart chemicals that like to bond with other chemicals.

Stephen M, no scientist has ever claimed that "everything came from nothing" like you imply. We've been able to make all the building blocks without our interference.

Answer 7

Why imagine it? Why not study it and appreciate it and marvel at the genious who created it and used it as a building block to create us?

I am a scientist and a Christian. Nothing that science has ever proven conflicts with my beliefs

Answer 8

I really don't know unless it's the type of person that has to be able to see everything in science to accept it.

Answer 9

It's not...but that molecule cannot replicate itself to produce something that it isn't supposed to...

No matter what you do you cannot turn lead into gold...

Answer 10

because god didn't create the xerox machine!!! nothing can exist in nature unless god designs it!!! god designs every molecule, it's right there in the bible!!! have you even bothered to read it???