No matter what the USA does, it will never be enough. The greedy countries that make up these conferences are never satisfied no matter how much they end up taking from America. They always want more.
So why should the USA go to these media shows just to get beat up by politicians who get their 5 minutes of face time in front of the camera? I'm sure blaming the US gets good reviews back home for these tin horned despots.
It's always the same thing. Next time the US should stay away from these conferences and just let the bashing go on with out us.
2007-12-14 04:26:57 · 13 answers · asked by Dr Jello 7 in Environment ➔ Global Warming
I disagree.
As long as we attend and portray the earnest appearance of "caring", we're helping the environment.
Right?
2007-12-14 05:16:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
We should stop funding the UN. Boycott any global warming conferences. We should just come up with our own solutions for our own country and not let these greedy, jealousy, anti-american thugs dictate what we should do. Just close the UN office in New York and tell them it is closed until further notice. When the money runs out they'll start kissing up to us again. They expect America to pay for everything, because America is so rich. But no matter how much we give it is never enough and they still hate us. Well, stop giving them anything and see how long they last. Then they can come back and start begging for money in a more respectful tone.
2007-12-14 10:05:50 · answer #2 · answered by James L 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely what fool can sit down here and say that 6 billion people have not killed the worlds oceans with the worldwide's crap going into it, interior the united statesalone 5 million a brilliant number of in basic terms AA batteries into the united statessoil and that they ask your self why the water is contaminated, definite autos and busses placed off an odar think of that is not risky!! With 4 billion too many people in the worldwide to substain us here interior the subsequent 40 years might look impossible however the individuals ought to attempt and as for the U.N what solid have they finished for everybody? ask your self that!
2016-12-17 17:59:24 · answer #3 · answered by leissa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is for the people of the US to decide. The problem for those of us who live outside the US but love your country is that you are increasingly being isolated and losing the respect of the rest of the world. As an example today's copy of The Independent carried a headline on the front page saying 'The world can't wait for George Bush.'
Before you withdraw into isolationism just look at your current account deficit and how the once mighty dollar is worth half of what it should be.
Nearly every developed country is already implementing measures to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide and methane and has target s. All we ask is the US does the same. But I am convinced that anything the US says will now be ignored and resentment against your pollution will increase.
2007-12-14 06:21:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
All we really have to do is what the other countries are doing.
Make outlandish laws and regulations that will never be implemented or adhered to (they are all 10 years away from even being enforced) and just play the game.
Contrary to popular opinion, Global Warming being a considerable man-made cause is not hardly scientific fact so I don't understand why so many people are clamoring about like it is a scientific fact. I undrestand why politico's are doing it, its gets votes and makes them feel important.
2007-12-14 05:06:48 · answer #5 · answered by Phil M 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Better to keep the illusion of talks going than giving up entirely. China and India just announced that they refuse to consider any limits that hurt economic growth. The US has no obligation to do anything more.
2007-12-14 04:36:58 · answer #6 · answered by Raven 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think we should boycott the UN.
Force them to move this corrupt, socialist organization somewhere else and stop giving these Third-World crooks my money!
2007-12-14 07:07:05 · answer #7 · answered by DJ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
USA should stop funding the anti American UN and send the headquarters abroad.
We certainly don't need them as much as they need us(our money).
2007-12-14 05:56:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Wake up Mr Pollution boy!
2007-12-14 06:14:21 · answer #9 · answered by Puppet Dictator 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The U.N. does seem to have an anti-U.S. agenda, but the reason to attend may boil down to "keep your friends close but your enemies closer."
They're even more likely to lynch us if we're not participating.
2007-12-14 07:02:14 · answer #10 · answered by J S 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋