No mithra is the monster who fought Godzilla.
In the fourth century, the Emperor Constantine designated December 25, the birthday of the Roman Sun-God Mithra, as the birthday of Jesus Christ, thereby placing the true Savior among the pantheon of Roman gods. Constantine succeed in drawing Christians into the pagan celebrations of Rome, which procured the religious unity needed for the success of the Holy Roman Empire. This empire dominated the world for 1200 years until the the 16th century, when the Protestant Reformers led 2/3 of Europe to break with the Roman Catholic Church and discontinued the celebration of Christmas by reason of its pagan character. The Puritans who controlled the English Parliament in 1644 declared that no observation of Christmas was permitted, calling it "The Profane Man’s Ranting Day." C. H. Spurgeon proclaimed as late as 1871: "We have no superstitious regard for times and seasons. Certainly, we do not believe in the present ecclesiastical arrangement called Christmas."
In America, founding members of the New York Historical Society revived the Christmas tradition in the early 1800s, and in 1836 the state of Alabama declared Christmas a legal holiday. No doubt many of Christians who strove to stem the tide of apostasy recalled the words of Tertullian, who lamented the identical compromise of Christendom as early as 230 B.C.
2007-12-14 04:07:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by blase' blahhh 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
No for the following reasons:
Mithra is not a roman sun. He was a Indo-Persian (Zorasterian) god covering friendship and contracts. in the Roman pantheon he became a life-death-rebirth God in the 200-300 CE's but he WAS NEVER a SUN GOD in any pantheon.
Mithra was never assigned a date of birth because he was born fully grown out of a rock if you read the original mythology. Only about 600 fragments of Mithra exist from the Roman cult and Justinus the 3rd century (non-Christian) Roman historian in Epitome states Mithra was stealing practices from Christianaity. The International Conference for Mithraic Studies officially documented and came out stating that Chrisitanity did not limit or co-opt Mithra, ummmm BACK IN 1975, thanks for keeping up on the latest news!
Roman's only ever had one cult of sun God and that was Sol Invictus, whose birthday was set at the 25th to counteract Christianity in 274 CE.
YOU GUYS STILL HAVE THE WRONG PAGAN GOD! I keep giving you hints, birthdates are coincidential. I keep telling you death is what matters to early Christians look for those WHO died the same day as Jesus. AND HE IS NOT EASILY FOUND ON THE INTERNET. nor was he a sun god , but a birth-death-rebirth.
2007-12-14 04:15:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mithra the Roman sun god? This is news to me. I believe Mithra was a Zoroastrian god. I believe you mean Mithras, with an -s, who was not the sun god in Roman mythology (who is usually thought of as Apollo or Mars), but was a god in Mithraism.
Mithras was supposed to sacrifice a bull for teh sins of humanity and end all sacrificial needs forever. Paul's understanding of Jesus' sacrifice in Galatians 1 & 2 clearly shows the influence of Mithraism on Christian understandings of Jesus' sacrifice.
Christianity does not hold that other religions are all wrong through and through. They hold that Christianity contains the fullness of God's revelations to humanity. I like the fact that Christianity has been at times willing to accept and assimilate some truth from another faith.
And between Mithras and Jesus the trouble is simply that Jesus was an actually person. We can reject his claims about Himself or accept them as we decide, but about Mithras no one is confused about whether he existed or no.
2007-12-14 04:14:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He always has been
but before that
horus would dissapear for 3 days at the 22nd, so the egytpians throgugh to the aztecs would cut out a live beating heaert to sginify his return
ishtar became mithra
from persia to greece to rome
in fact mithra is also called Venus columbia
Venus the Dove
in fact watch a Columbia film and you will see her holding a torch at the begining
in fact go to the East side of New york harbour and you will see a statue of her holding a torch, wearing the seven ray crown of mithra, cunning disguised with the words liberty.
Liberty was a prostitute from the french revolution after they had done away with their kings and queens and invented human rights.
But liberty was really a human version of mithra in disguise.
Today, some actors take up this role of mithra, infact a famous tall blonde received a knighthood from france, and stars in films called Venus and hangs off the statue of liberyty for this very reason
sad but true
peace in Christ
2007-12-14 04:12:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
hi, they do no longer. Mithra grew to become into taught in Catholic faculties in my toddler boomer years as portion of our history of the Roman Empire.initially the party of Christ's delivery grew to become into in many instances lumped in with Epiphany (January 6), between the church's earliest standard feasts. some church leaders even adversarial the belief of a delivery party. Origen (c.185-c.254) preached that it would be incorrect to honor Christ interior the same way Pharaoh and Herod have been commemorated. Birthdays have been for pagan gods. no longer all of Origen's contemporaries agreed that Christ's birthday should not be celebrated, and a few began to invest on the date (somewhat records have been curiously long misplaced). Clement of Alexandria (c.a hundred and fifty-c.215) favored could 20 yet observed that others had argued for April 18, April 19, and could 28. Hippolytus (c.a hundred and seventy-c.236) championed January 2. November 17, November 20, and March 25 all had backers besides. A Latin treatise written around 243 pegged March 21, by using fact grew to become into believed to be the date on which God created the solar. Polycarp (c.sixty 9-c.a hundred and fifty five) had accompanied the same line of reasoning to end that Christ's delivery and baptism maximum possibly got here approximately on Wednesday, by using fact the solar grew to become into created on the fourth day. The eventual determination of December 25, made possibly as early as 273, reflects a convergence of Origen's undertaking approximately pagan gods and the church's identity of God's son with the celestial solar. December 25 already hosted 2 different proper fairs: natalis solis invicti (the Roman "delivery of the unconquered solar"), and the birthday of Mithras, the Iranian "solar of Righteousness" whose worship grew to become into properly-known with Roman infantrymen. The wintry climate solstice, yet another party of the solar, fell basically some days until now. by using fact pagans have been already exalting deities with some parallels to the actual deity, church leaders desperate to commandeer the date and introduce a clean pageant. Cheers, Michael Kelly
2016-11-26 23:26:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Mithras is indirectly responsible for the inspiration of the creation of the Jesus myth: a lie which has plagued mankind for many centuries.
2007-12-14 04:09:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I just celebrate December. Everyone is having parties and I'm invited! As long as there's food and booze involved, pray to whomever you want - except for someone like Bush or Cheney.
2007-12-14 04:21:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mithra is also present in Hinduism and Zorastrianism as Mihira!
2007-12-14 04:13:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, that is the day I choose to celebrate the birth of Jesus. (and I am quite aware that he was not born on that day and why the day was chosen so long ago, it just doesn't bug me.)
I don't care if someone decides to celebrate the toothfairy's birthday on that day. DO what you believe and let everyone else do the same.
2007-12-14 04:11:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. I will not. I will be remembering the birht of the Son of God, however. (I realize that Christ was not actually born on Dec 25. ) But since that is the time of year that the world
commerates it, I will too.
Christ was actually born in the Spring. In April.
2007-12-14 04:14:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kerry 7
·
1⤊
1⤋