So global warming is about a new form wealth distribution?

Question

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=d5c3c93f-802a-23ad-4f29-fe59494b48a6&Issue_id=

‘Redistribution of wealth’

The environmental group Friends of the Earth, in attendance in Bali, also advocated the transfer of money from rich to poor nations on Wednesday.

“A climate change response must have at its heart a redistribution of wealth and resources,” said Emma Brindal, a climate justice campaigner coordinator for Friends of the Earth.
http://www.climatenetwork.org/bali-blog/ngo-bustle-in-bali

Now the true motivatives are coming to the surface shouldn't they be question just as much as those who critize man-made global warming being in bed with big oil?

Answer 1

This is the crux of the problem with regard to global warming. It is as much about Political and financial motivations as it is about science. This mix makes for bad politics and even worse science.

Answer 2

I'd be curious to know how much wealth Emma has shifted. Often the people who say these things have no wealth to shift. They simply feel more powerful acting self-important and self-righteous.

Carbon credits are another way to shift wealth, within the U.S.. Dropping theft from the agenda has to be part of any solution I'll support.

As for whether it's driving the research behind global warming... no way. Most researchers are not rich. They'll be no more eager to foot the bill than the rest of us.

Answer 3

This is the main agenda for some global warming activists. For others, it is the elimination of the current technology based society. Still others hope to use global warming as an excuse to put the government, with them in charge of course, in charge of every aspect of our lives. Everyones true agenda can be determined by analyzing their proposed actions. When you do this, you see that very few of those expressing concern about global warming are really interested in reducing green house gases. For example, how many of the global warming activists are demanding an immediate switch to nuclear powered electrical generation, even though this would produce massive reductions in CO2 emissions while preserving our current way of life?

Answer 4

you have 2 diverse matters right here. Fascism is definitely a social concern, while a undeniable race or team believe they are extra helpful than everybody else. communism is a financial device have been all products and centers are shared the two. challenge with it is: a million. no incentive to produce extra (gonna gets a commission the comparable besides) 2. the "human factor" somebody will continually be grasping and stick there hand interior the pot and get extra 3. high quality of things usually won't be able to be offered on international markets, for this reason a stagnate monetary device. the U. S. has Capitalism. individually i think of that it gets out of hand, and you finally end up with nobility, this has occurred till now in heritage and brought about the super melancholy. (additionally the shortcoming of government policies on banks) the device seems good on paper, however the priority we are having is that a million. those with money impact politics and get rules handed to extra there very own financial earnings 2. the so pronounced as "fixes" that businesses enforce do no longer artwork. in the event that they are dropping money, they lay off workers, extra destructive the monetary device. additionally, the CEO's of the business enterprise advantages themselves for undesirable performances, taking extra money from the business enterprise. at that element, the shrink advantages for the employees making the situation even worst. As heritage has shown, often certainly one of two issues ensue a million. Revolution (human beings get drained and overthrow the government) 2. huge international melancholy (because of products no longer being offered because of the fact no one has money. there's a challenge, and with a bit of luck somebody has the smarts to offer up letting the great companies run the rustic.

Answer 5

The whole "credits" idea is basically crazy. There is no need to transfer huge amounts of money around in order to reduce emissions.

That said, there is ample evidence to support the premise that the earth is warming and that it is influenced by human activities. The amount of warming and the degree of influence and how much reducing emissions will actually help is the real debate.

Answer 6

The Globalist and climate control scam is exposed!

We have all heard follow the money. In this era oil is the money. The funny thing is that in the USA and most all countries can produce all the clean oil and efficient energy needed for themselves. With solar, hydro, wind, plants, animal and human waste. (Fossil fuel that would be natural waste.) The jig is up. Oil mongers and the globalization power seekers are exposed. The climate change hoax is a power grab from wealthy elites in hopes of keeping countries oil and energy dependent. They will attempt stop nations from producing bio fuels and other clean energy in the name pollution and climate catastrophes. Teaching self-dependence will it will harm the planet. The truth is most all nations don’t need foreign oil or other outside energy resources. Just have the freedom, education and modern resources to manage themselves, with the conservation in mind and with their God given resources they have. Big government control equals bigger problems.

Answer 7

Any CO2 reduction scheme that does not impose limits on all players will never work because of basic economics and globalized trade. This is what has happened in europe where europeans like to claim that they reduced CO2 production but what they really did is move production from europe to countries like china who have no limits. Reducing CO2 in rich countries will never be economically as long as it is cheaper to move production to a country with no limits.

Answer 8

Not the global warming, but the carbon credit trading that is proposed to fight it is just that, a wealth transfer.

Answer 9

Global warming is a sham to extort money.

No one can tell you with any better certainty of a coin flip if it will be warmer or colder 5 years from now.

Only your faith decides what you believe.

Answer 10

Exactly right.

I wouldn't be surprised to find out that 'big oil' is secretly backing and instigating the 'man made global warming' scare to gain more control.