Prominent creation scientist Em Adjineri (say her name aloud) has recently been studying komodo dragons. She had discovered that these creatures prove that evolution is false.
According to the theory of evolutionarianism, komodo dragons must have evolved from fire-breathing dragons (I'm ignoring what it really says because it hurts my argument). If komodo dragons evolved from fire-breathing dragons, we should expect to find some transitional form.
A transitional form between a fire-breathing dragon and a non-fire-breathing dragon would be a dragon that blows hot air. However, the only organisms that blow hot air are people. (For example, both me and Em Adjineri are full of hot air.)
Since there is no transitional form between ancient dragons and komodo dragons, komodo dragons must have been created in their present form by God. This fact confirms that the rest of the Bible is literally true and thus evolution is false.
2007-12-14 01:33:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
"Em Adjineri" hehehe.
are horses and unicorns related also? where's the evidence? tosh! i say.
2007-12-14 01:45:08 · answer #1 · answered by GEISHA 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
1. Do you not have any clue as to how science works? The belief that 99% of the species that have ever existed are now extinct (or have evolved into other species) is based on logical, scientific investigation and interpretation of the available evidence (fossil evidence etc). 2. What? I don't know what you mean. I think you're confused. 3. There is currently no evidence to support the existence, past or present, of life on any of the other 7 planets (there are 8 proper planets dude, Pluto has been downgraded), so again I don't know what you're getting at here. And what's this about the other planets 'protecting' the earth? Cobblers. 4. That's a gross misinterpretation of the way the natural world works. The natural world is constantly changing, it's not static at all, or at least not in the long run. Evolution and extinction are a natural part of this. You have an extraordinarily screwed up view of the world around you my friend. Read some books and open your eyes, or you'll be wallowing in ignorance for the rest of your life. Of course you could just be a troll, in which case, good work!
2016-05-23 22:23:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blowing hot air is not the same as breathing fire! An animal which blows fire is fictional. It is called a fire-breathing dragon, and makes no sense to me. Even if they did exist, how does this prove the bible is true? It proves nothing. Komodo dragons are lizards, they are no different than many other reptiles or amphibians. You are presenting correlation evidence. Not fact. So according to the theory of evoloution I would have come from fire breathing people, because I blow hot air? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komodo_dragon
2007-12-14 01:53:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well... as soon as you can prove to me that fire breathing dragons existed in the first place... and don't say literature... that doesn't count. Now, if you said dinosaurs... that might be a different story... but komodo dragons, alligators, and crocodiles are all LESS evolved than most of the other creatures on the planet, yes... but they aren't quite dinosaurs. They might be dinosaurs with less mass... requiring less food... but they are still not quite classified as dinosaurs.
2007-12-14 01:56:17 · answer #4 · answered by dj.hatchytt 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They're alien life forms, simple as that.
Millions of years ago, a silvery sphere of an alien spacecraft crash-landed on earth in present-day Java / Indonesia. Reptilian, bipedal life forms of various sorts found themselves marooned on our planet, and some of them happened to be mortally wounded.
The mortally wounded happened to have among them multiple male and female members, and coincidentally their injuries were brain-specific, their higher functions had largely been obliterated, leaving only the basic fight-or-flight, breathing, and other basic survival mechanisms.
The surgeon used the vessel's medical robot to alter the creatures' brain structure and DNA to accomodate. A compassionate soul, the surgeon hoped that at least his former colleagues could perpetuate themselves and enjoy some semblance of life with what little of their original grey matter remained.
The vessel's on-board nanite engineers managed to self repair the ship's anti-gravity and hyperdrive subsystems, and the doctor and a few remaining high-functioning subordinates made their way to their home planet, wishing their former comrades a fond farewell.
Over many millions of years, bipedal stature fell away in favor of a lower-profile lizard-like posture. For balance and to stun prey, a massive tail developed. Symbiotic bacteria developed in the mouth parts of the lizard creatures which happened to be debilitating to prey when released into their circulatory systems through bites or scratches.
Thus, the komodo dragon has developed and endured and even today remains a fearsome predator in its habitat.
2007-12-14 01:47:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
"Survival of the fittest" is a conversational way to describe natural selection, but a more technical description speaks of differential rates of survival and reproduction. That is, rather than labeling species as more or less fit, one can describe how many offspring they are likely to leave under given circumstances. Drop a fast-breeding pair of small-beaked finches and a slower-breeding pair of large-beaked finches onto an island full of food seeds. Within a few generations the fast breeders may control more of the food resources. Yet if large beaks more easily crush seeds, the advantage may tip to the slow breeders. In a pioneering study of finches on the Gal�pagos Islands, Peter R. Grant of Princeton University observed these kinds of population shifts in the wild. The key is that adaptive fitness can be defined without reference to survival: large beaks are better adapted for crushing seeds, irrespective of whether that trait has survival value under the circumstances.
2007-12-14 01:57:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Komodo dragon is just a giant lizard.
2007-12-14 01:49:31 · answer #7 · answered by Freethinking Liberal 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"According to the theory of evolutionarianism, komodo dragons must have evolved from fire-breathing dragons (I'm ignoring what it really says because it hurts my argument). If komodo dragons evolved from fire-breathing dragons, we should expect to find some transitional form."
and just WHY would they have had to evolve from fire-breathing dragons? because the name "dragon" is in their name?
what kind of waste is this post?
2007-12-14 01:42:24 · answer #8 · answered by no body 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
The key here is that you left something out because it hurt your argument. And the link between monkeys and humans were cavemen, and they're not around anymore, right?
2007-12-14 01:38:39 · answer #9 · answered by Becca 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I was wondering when that dastardly Em Adjineri would make a resurgent comeback.
...Windom rides again.
2007-12-14 01:51:31 · answer #10 · answered by Skalite 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Okay! I doubt your looking for serious answers but a simple one would be that not all transitional forms have had the good fortune to be fossilized and preserved for so many years.
2007-12-14 01:40:07 · answer #11 · answered by That's Why 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋