Even quantum physicists believe otherwise. They have proved through their pursuit of explaining everything, that there are several dimensions. Meaning more than one object can occupy the same time and space. This is part of their string theory. Science is getting closer all the time to proving the existence of God. If you are honest in your pursuit of the truth you will be able to see it. Check out the book; THE FORGOTTEN TRUTH
Check it out on this site. It is free to download or copy and past. Just click the link below. Then click on the enter button.
http://theforgottentruth.webs.com/
God bless
2007-12-13 15:28:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by terry b 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask this in the science section, retard. Asking in the R&S means that you don't want a real answer. YOU said: "1 - The evolutionary formula for making a universe: Nothing + nothing = two elements + time = 92 natural elements + time = all physical laws and a completely structured universe of galaxies, systems, stars, planets, and moons orbiting in perfect balance and order." =========================== This has nothing to do with evolution, but I'll answer it anyways. If the universe is cyclic (which it probably is) then our universe is an inevitability, no matter how unlikely, it will still happen this way infinitely many times. It's not a cause to invent a god when we don't know what fills the gap. Just wait a few more weeks, the good people at CERN are looking for the Higgs Boson, and if they find it, you'll be dead in the water. Also, try a little research. Read up on the string theory, and its cyclic universe models, and research quantum fluctuation. Qflux allows something to come from nothing. YOU wrote: "2 - The evolutionary formula for making life: Dirt + water + time = living creatures." ========================== First of all, that's bio-genesis, not evolution. Second, it's a little more complicated than that. You've also forgotten the essential energy component to the equation. Besides, in the primordial soup of early earth, long, complex hydrocarbons known as "organic molecules" formed naturally. Cell membranes are made of phospho-lipid bilayers, which also occur naturally. The combination of the two, plus a little energy can go a long way. DARWIN wrote: "“As by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed. Why do we not find them embedded in the crust of the earth? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of being, as we see them, well-defined species?”" =========================== Well sure, but punctuated equilibrium wasn't a theory back then. That's number one. Number two is that the fossil record was very, very small in Darwin's time. That was a hundred and fifty years ago. Any quote about the fossil record from that time is irrelevant, because the fossil record has changed so much. YOU wrote: "Complicated things, such as wooden boxes with nails in them, require thought, intelligence, and careful workmanship. But everything else about us in nature (such as hummingbirds and the human eye) is declared to be the result of accidental mishaps, random confusion, and time. You will not even need raw materials to begin with." ========================= What a terrible false analogy. Boxes have no method of reproduction or mutation. They can't evolve or improve themselves. Hummingbirds and the human eye aren't random, they're the result of evolutionary pressure on an organism. Research the theory of evolution before presenting such terrible straw men. @the last bit of that: what are you talking about? The raw materials were on early earth, and were most likely created 13 billion years ago by the collision of two m-branes, or they have always existed. Besides, quantum fluctuation allows something to come from nothing.
2016-05-23 11:52:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by madeleine 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
How ignorant to think that all there is is the stuff we can experience with our senses. A man that is blind from birth will never experience colors, yet they exist....think about it.
2007-12-13 15:41:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
All that has ever existed/will exist exists in a field called "existence."
What is existence itself? How can one thing contain so much?
The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
2007-12-13 15:16:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The spiritual world is more real than what we see, the spirit effects the natural. The things we see are a fuzzy view explaining the spirit
2007-12-13 15:15:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rev.Michelle 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
First responder is correct. Since there is, by definition, no way of detecting anything else, it is idle to suppose that there IS anything else: it could not possibly matter.
2007-12-13 15:19:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, there is so much more than just what we can touch and see. There is a whole spiritual world.
2007-12-13 15:21:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by michelle 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Everyone here that answered 'yes' to this question defies their own answer by having 'thought' enough to answer at all.
2007-12-13 16:47:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Molly 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
There's no evidence of anything else so it's better not to believe there is.
2007-12-13 15:18:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by bestonnet_00 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I believe in a very powerful spiritual world.
2007-12-13 15:17:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Thrice Blessed 6
·
2⤊
4⤋